Author | Thread |
|
03/05/2004 01:15:24 AM · #1 |
i was looking through some photoblogs.. and found this image.... and not being a kid picture liker.... however, this one i think it is very stunning
here is the link to the larger picture and site here
.... very intriging..
Message edited by author 2004-03-05 01:15:48.
|
|
|
03/05/2004 11:59:17 AM · #2 |
|
|
03/05/2004 12:02:53 PM · #3 |
It's different, that's for sure. Kinda looks like it was NeatImaged to death though.
|
|
|
03/05/2004 12:05:39 PM · #4 |
yeah? is that it?
I coudln't figure it out.. why his images look the way they do.. with that soft, impact. All his pictures have that sort of look.
|
|
|
03/05/2004 12:07:47 PM · #5 |
Her face has no poors, it's been attacked by neat image...
Very striking image though... I like it!
|
|
|
03/05/2004 12:08:45 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by leaf: yeah? is that it?
I coudln't figure it out.. why his images look the way they do.. with that soft, impact. All his pictures have that sort of look. |
Plus he has heavily blurred the background, you can see evidence of that next to her right arm.
She is a beautiful child. |
|
|
03/05/2004 01:28:54 PM · #7 |
yeah you know, i think your right...
also now looking at it.. on the left side of the image, you can see pretty clearly a 'blur' technique line... where it all of a sudden gets REALLY blury, however, i think it does work, or adds to the photo.
|
|
|
03/05/2004 01:39:47 PM · #8 |
Nevermind the kid. His/her other photos are incredible. |
|
|
03/05/2004 05:06:42 PM · #9 |
Some good guesses, but not entirely right ;-) The background is marginally blurred (this was shot at the far end of the macro mode so the background was pretty blurry anyway); I don't know what Neat Image is (though you're right, her face was blurred in PS); the soft effect, in this instance, is the result of a blurred layer set to overlay blend mode; and you missed the most glaring error - I inadvertently desaturated the right edge of her left sleeve (it looks really noticeable to me).
The reason this image was so heavily manipulated is that I liked the shot, but she looked really tired and had terrible shadows on her fact from the overhead strip-lighting. Normally I would have binned it, but there was something about her expression that made me want to keep it.
And thanks for the nice comments - if I ever get the time I guess I should contribute here. I registered ages ago, but just haven't had the time to get involved.
cheers,
dave (www.chromasia.com) |
|
|
03/05/2004 06:31:06 PM · #10 |
my addition:
my 1st ever kid pic, and its not my kid. |
|
|
03/05/2004 08:37:55 PM · #11 |
hi there djn1
I am glad to get the whole story about the photo... :) and glad you decided to poke your head in here.
I am not very good at using adjustment layers... does anyone have any good tips or know of any good tutorials.
|
|
|
03/05/2004 08:42:00 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by djn1:
- if I ever get the time I guess I should contribute here. I registered ages ago, but just haven't had the time to get involved.
cheers,
dave (www.chromasia.com) |
You really should try to contribute. I really liked what I saw of your photos. Will be back to have another look when I've got more time.
|
|
|
03/06/2004 11:04:34 AM · #13 |
That kid is wearing a bunch of make-up, too.
Originally posted by leaf: i was looking through some photoblogs.. and found this image.... and not being a kid picture liker.... however, this one i think it is very stunning
here is the link to the larger picture and site here
.... very intriging.. |
|
|
|
03/06/2004 11:24:13 AM · #14 |
The negative space on right side is distracting,background blur is done poorly(cheap camera)too much software,not enough photography , I give it 6 !
|
|
|
03/06/2004 05:42:02 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by pitsaman: The negative space on right side is distracting,background blur is done poorly(cheap camera)too much software,not enough photography , I give it 6 ! |
wow.. that's harsh.
:).....
but fair enough.
yeah i dunno.. i don't find the negative space distracting.
i don't think she was wearing makeup though.. i think the very dark eyes are just a result of the adjustment layer techniques he used.
|
|
|
03/06/2004 05:56:27 PM · #16 |
that really looks like makeup
|
|
|
03/06/2004 06:04:14 PM · #17 |
I love the picture. I don't know anything about Neat Image or.. blurring backgrounds or anything. I just point and shoot. The furthest of my editing abilities is cropping. But I agree with how striking it is.. looking at the whole rather than scrutinizing all of the little parts, I think it's beautiful and... yes, striking is really the word for it.
My two cents! |
|
|
03/06/2004 06:06:54 PM · #18 |
TG73: oddly enough I don't tend to apply make up to my two year old before taking her to the supermarket - that would be a little excessive. Leaf is right, the effect is a consequence of using a blurred overlay adjustment layer. There's a good book my Martin Evening that covers the basics of adjustment layers if you're interested in finding out more (Adobe Photoshop for Photographers) ;-)
pitsaman: the blur is mostly a consequence of using macro mode. Additional blur was added by a 150px feathered selection and a Gaussian blur of around 8px - how would you have done it? As for the camera, it's a Canon G5, so no, not overly expensive, but then neither is the 300D. And yes, it's over-processed, but it was a shot I liked that required a lot of work to make it presentable. I could have binned the original, but I didn't. Personally, I like it, and it's got some great feedback on my site - so I'm happy :-D
Leaf: thanks. |
|
|
03/06/2004 06:08:14 PM · #19 |
htseg: yes, the key word there is 'looks' - it isn't ;-)
lindsay: thank you. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/22/2024 04:17:35 AM EST.