Author | Thread |
|
04/25/2022 08:00:10 PM · #1 |
Originally posted by jomari: You gave me a fright there. I thought I'd missed 'minimal' for the current challenge. Phew. |
Ditto. I can also report a short minor panic there! |
|
|
04/25/2022 05:20:52 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by jomari: You gave me a fright there. I thought I'd missed 'minimal' for the current challenge. Phew. |
Just now recovering from a heart attack for the same reason. Saw this thread and thought WHAT????? |
Me, too. *sigh* |
|
|
04/25/2022 03:06:34 PM · #3 |
I read this fast with old eyes and thought it said "Lawyers II"- which is either the second go round at a very boring challenge- or an equally abysmal sequel starring Andrew McCarthy and Jesse Eisenberg.
Message edited by author 2022-04-25 15:06:52. |
|
|
04/25/2022 02:48:57 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Tiberius: Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by jomari: You gave me a fright there. I thought I'd missed 'minimal' for the current challenge. Phew. |
Just now recovering from a heart attack for the same reason. Saw this thread and thought WHAT????? |
+1 lol |
Add +1 to that :) |
|
|
04/25/2022 01:31:43 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by jomari: You gave me a fright there. I thought I'd missed 'minimal' for the current challenge. Phew. |
Just now recovering from a heart attack for the same reason. Saw this thread and thought WHAT????? |
+1 lol |
|
|
04/25/2022 01:22:19 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by jomari: You gave me a fright there. I thought I'd missed 'minimal' for the current challenge. Phew. |
Just now recovering from a heart attack for the same reason. Saw this thread and thought WHAT????? |
|
|
04/25/2022 01:09:21 AM · #7 |
Sorry jomari! I just didn't want to start a new thread.
Minimal would have been fine, but extended would be quite different and hopefully a little surreal. Also believe it would be a bit different from a 'composite' challenge where the layers aren't necessarily discernible. |
|
|
04/25/2022 12:53:42 AM · #8 |
You gave me a fright there. I thought I'd missed 'minimal' for the current challenge. Phew. |
|
|
04/24/2022 10:12:20 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by skewsme: Re: Layers, standard editing - the current challenge
Running this as extended editing would be pretty cool, archival or not. Hope it can be considered in the future. |
Or ... Minimal would be cool also. As originally suggested. :-( |
|
|
04/24/2022 09:41:25 PM · #10 |
Re: Layers, standard editing - the current challenge
Running this as extended editing would be pretty cool, archival or not. Hope it can be considered in the future. |
|
|
12/02/2017 02:35:02 AM · #11 |
Agree for minimal with this one
+1 |
|
|
12/02/2017 12:08:04 AM · #12 |
|
|
12/26/2016 11:59:01 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by glad2badad: Layers II
Description
Capture an image that depicts layers of something. Examples; an onion has layers, a bed has layers (sheet, blanket, comforter), a field/pasture can have layers (fence line, tall grass or crop, distant tree line).
Minimal Challenge Rules. |
+1 |
|
|
12/26/2016 11:49:37 AM · #14 |
Layers II
Description
Capture an image that depicts layers of something. Examples; an onion has layers, a bed has layers (sheet, blanket, comforter), a field/pasture can have layers (fence line, tall grass or crop, distant tree line).
Minimal Challenge Rules. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 01:32:34 PM EDT.