Sooo, uh what gives? - DPChallenge Forums

Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS

06/02/2011 11:34:17 AM · #1

** Warning: This post has been hidden as it may content mature content. Click here to show the post.

vawendy

Sony Alpha 1

06/02/2011 11:35:57 AM · #2

I hadn't looked at the free study yet, but I assume we're seeing more than we're supposed to see.

Sony Sonnar FE 2.8 35mm ZA

06/02/2011 11:39:21 AM · #3

Originally posted by vawendy:

but I assume we're seeing more than we're supposed to see.

Ahhh... the bottom of her feet?

jagar

Samsung Galaxy S9/S9+

06/02/2011 11:45:18 AM · #4

I bet in thirty minutes this will have been seen more than mine has.

smardaz

06/02/2011 11:48:46 AM · #5

oh man, and i gave that one of my best comments ever!

06/02/2011 11:56:38 AM · #6

Ok, I did some study, I copied the image and with my photo editor i zoomed in as viewable possible... There is no doubt in my mind, and others for sure that you can literally see it visible, and yes there it was...
.
.
.
.
.
I could see her eye, that's a big no no!

06/02/2011 12:04:48 PM · #7

Did you download the Hi-Res? There is no eye.

06/02/2011 12:13:58 PM · #8

Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Did you download the Hi-Res? There is no eye.

Well, it depends on where you look at... I clearly see an eye, under her arm ;)

Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS

06/02/2011 12:15:58 PM · #9

lol

vawendy

Sony Alpha 1

06/02/2011 01:32:22 PM · #10

Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Originally posted by vawendy:
but I assume we're seeing more than we're supposed to see.

Ahhh... the bottom of her feet?

You know there are a lot of people here with feet fetishes. Do you really want to contribute to their decline?

Strikeslip

Canon EOS-5D

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS

06/02/2011 01:41:32 PM · #11

I am morally outraged every time I take a whiz and see my junk!

Louis

Nikon D800

Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D

06/02/2011 02:29:42 PM · #12

Here ya go...

GeneralE

Canon PowerShot S3 IS

Canon 12x IS USM (S3 IS built-in Lens) -- 36-432mm (35mm EQ)

06/02/2011 02:33:18 PM · #13

Originally posted by Louis:

Here ya go...

Are you suggesting he change his user (or perhaps non-user?) name to Strikesnip?

Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) for Canon

06/02/2011 02:37:11 PM · #14

Originally posted by GeneralE:

Originally posted by Louis:
Here ya go...

Are you suggesting he change his user (or perhaps non-user?) name to Strikesnip?

More openly "StrikeMyBalls" ?

curtpetguy

Canon EOS-50D

06/02/2011 02:50:06 PM · #15

Not one of my favs Leroy , but I don't see why it was dq

PhotoDave

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II

06/02/2011 03:38:55 PM · #16

You Leroy are GUILTY until proven innocent!

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

06/02/2011 03:43:34 PM · #17

The photo looks like it was taken at a train station. That's against the Patriot Act. Do you even know what happened on 9-11???

Leroy--->No Fly List

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

06/02/2011 11:17:15 PM · #18

Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

Leroy--->No Fly List

That explains the men in black suits that have been following me around.

I thought they were just well-dressed stalkers.

MattO

Nikon D4

06/03/2011 12:28:30 AM · #19

I think it should be very clear why it's been removed. Since this isn't your first offense in that area you really should know better.

Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) for Nikon

06/03/2011 12:38:41 AM · #20

Originally posted by MattO:

Since this isn't your first offense in that area ...

You remembering something I'm not? As far as I recall I'd yet to be DQ'd for nudity.

levyj413

Nikon D7100

06/03/2011 12:40:15 AM · #21

C'mon, Leroy. Although I admit it's hard to see in the entry vs. the full-res version, and I think someone really had to go out of their way to submit it for DQ, you captured genitalia.

There. Now it's spelled out.

Message edited by author 2011-06-03 00:46:10.

06/03/2011 12:41:35 AM · #22

Originally posted by MattO:

I think it should be very clear why it's been removed.

And no it's not clear....

06/03/2011 12:42:43 AM · #23

Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Originally posted by MattO:
I think it should be very clear why it's been removed.

And no it's not clear....

You mean she doesn't wipe?