| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/18/2002 08:29:00 AM · #1 |
| Yep, what one might consider a mistake. It can be made to 'work' of course and might be interesting. |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 08:46:09 AM · #2 |
I think this would be a fun concept also, but it may be a difficult for folks who do not have manual control of their cameras..
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 08:55:46 AM · #3 |
| You mean motion blur as opposed to out of focus? |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 12:15:55 PM · #4 |
Well, I was thinking motion Blur, however I would not limit it myself. I assume motion blur woulkd get better scores.
Hmmm.. without manual cameras... I get blury shots on auto all the time. =) |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 12:37:32 PM · #5 |
| Could it be something like Daisies on this page? |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 12:45:12 PM · #6 |
Technically, though my guess is that most higher scores would go towards subjects more blurred than that.
//www.jameskay.com/biking/MB_1373.htm
Also perhaps something in which the subject is not blurred but the background is. Birds flying ect.
Personally I am not much for making the rules picky, just figure they sewt the idea and people do what they wish with it. |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 12:47:40 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Agamemnon:
Technically, though my guess is that most higher scores would go towards subjects more blurred than that.
//www.jameskay.com/biking/MB_1373.htm
Also perhaps something in which the subject is not blurred but the background is. Birds flying ect.
Personally I am not much for making the rules picky, just figure they sewt the idea and people do what they wish with it.
Ah....I'm not even in your realm...that was done with no Photoshop? That is fantastic!
K |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 02:13:16 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Agamemnon:
Technically, though my guess is that most higher scores would go towards subjects more blurred than that.
//www.jameskay.com/biking/MB_1373.htm
Also perhaps something in which the subject is not blurred but the background is. Birds flying ect.
Do you mean like this photo I found?//www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=84255
That would be really fun to try. :)
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 03:12:34 PM · #9 |
| That would have a good chance of winning I think... well now people will say it is unoriginal but Great Shot none the less. |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 03:18:19 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Agamemnon:
Technically, though my guess is that most higher scores would go towards subjects more blurred than that.
//www.jameskay.com/biking/MB_1373.htm
Also perhaps something in which the subject is not blurred but the background is. Birds flying ect.
Personally I am not much for making the rules picky, just figure they sewt the idea and people do what they wish with it.
I think this James Kay photo is impossible to achieve on a non SLR digital camera... This is done by twisting the zoom while you open the shutter.
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 04:31:43 PM · #11 |
although i like this picture very much, i do not think that this is the kind that will do well on this site. or is it? : )
diaphanous |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 04:37:21 PM · #12 |
I really love that picture,.. but then I really like softer more abstract images. although your probably right that it wouldn’t do as well on this site as it might do on more artistic sites, but then maybe the more thought provoking images that are submitted to this site the more broader the minds of non artistic or new photographers minds will become.
Just a thought
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 05:53:27 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Ronin:
I really love that picture,.. but then I really like softer more abstract images. although your probably right that it wouldn’t do as well on this site as it might do on more artistic sites, but then maybe the more thought provoking images that are submitted to this site the more broader the minds of non artistic or new photographers minds will become.
Just a thought
thx :) that pic was really just a happy accident : )
i really like your thought
and it's one i've had myself. like what if we all just hijacked the agenda of the site and saturated it with more artistic images?
could we do it? could it be done? |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 06:48:10 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by jmsetzler:
Originally posted by Agamemnon:
[i]Technically, though my guess is that most higher scores would go towards subjects more blurred than that.
//www.jameskay.com/biking/MB_1373.htm
Also perhaps something in which the subject is not blurred but the background is. Birds flying ect.
Personally I am not much for making the rules picky, just figure they sewt the idea and people do what they wish with it.
I think this James Kay photo is impossible to achieve on a non SLR digital camera... This is done by twisting the zoom while you open the shutter.
[/i]
Wouldn't it be possible to capture this without the twisty zoom if you were riding (on a smooth, even path) towards another bicyclist?
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 06:56:17 PM · #15 |
| If not a the exact picture a variation.... something is at least possible from every camera. |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 08:22:03 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by KDJohnson:
Could it be something like Daisies on this page?
absolutely fabulous combination of pics! - you should be clearing up in our competitions.
Vin
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 08:25:18 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
although i like this picture very much, i do not think that this is the kind that will do well on this site. or is it? : )
diaphanous
really beautiful.
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 09:00:20 PM · #18 |
I have to say I am sort of impressed with that one also magnetic, yet another example why this wo9uld be an interesting challenge
*wink, wink* |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 09:00:56 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
... like what if we all just hijacked the agenda of the site and saturated it with more artistic images?
could we do it? could it be done?
Anarchy! Anarchy! Wher's a moderator!!! Ooo! ;-)
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 10:17:27 PM · #20 |
Vin,
Thanks! You're one of my favorite photographers, so that means a lot to me. I appreciate that.
Karen |
|
|
|
07/18/2002 11:00:27 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by magnetic9999:
and it's one i've had myself. like what if we all just hijacked the agenda of the site and saturated it with more artistic images?
could we do it? could it be done?
hehe... I'll have to have my eyes hijaked by a more artistic person to join in on the revolution, but I'm willing to give it a try. Low scores, 'didn't meet the challenge', and 'I don't get it' comments be damned! Let's go for it!!!
|
|
|
|
07/18/2002 11:19:09 PM · #22 |
shame we are not doing blur this week. i''ve just been to see the kodo drummers tonight and would actually have an entry! even if it may not be sufficiently artistic and i know drums are so cliche! *grin*
* This message has been edited by the author on 7/18/2002 11:30:29 PM. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/17/2024 08:30:50 PM EDT.
