| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/28/2016 06:52:06 PM · #1 |
SEG's post has the correct reference. thank you SEG.
Message edited by author 2016-02-28 19:18:44. |
|
|
|
02/28/2016 07:07:04 PM · #2 |
| Which of all of those is the article you mean???? |
|
|
|
02/28/2016 07:10:44 PM · #3 |
| I think this is the one they are trying to reference. This has been brewing for a while. |
|
|
|
02/28/2016 07:24:29 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
02/29/2016 01:20:08 PM · #5 |
I certainly don't want to conclude they are guilty until they are proven so, but frankly they have had such a history of disputes, mostly for this type of thing, that the preponderance of evidence says that they indeed do have reprehensible labor practices.
I think that until they can show that they have changed their corporate culture (and good luck with that in a family-owned business) I will put them at least two steps down on my list of preferred suppliers. I hate to do it because they are pretty much the best there is for customer service, but I can't stomach that kind of treatment of staff.
ETA: I'm sure it is only a matter of time before Mr. Posner sees this and adds his two cents.
Message edited by author 2016-02-29 13:22:44.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/16/2024 05:08:25 PM EDT.
