Author | Thread |
|
07/22/2016 11:15:52 AM · #1 |
A potential client of mine want to make a presentation to someone in the hopes of getting a project funded.
She wants me to take a photo of a small (4X5) printout, then enlarge it to about 8X10 ... FEET.
Please tell me this is possible, please? My spidey senses are telling me it isn't... |
|
|
07/22/2016 11:23:09 AM · #2 |
So she wants you to take a photo of a photo...?
You might want to shoot Brent_S a message. He does a lot of upsampling and huge prints. I'm pretty sure he does it with captures from a DSLR.
But I'd have to ask, how is she going to present an 8x10 foot photo....??? |
|
|
07/22/2016 11:28:30 AM · #3 |
CSI is your only hope..
Rescaling [Gimp-talk] the pixels per mm is possible till just before it's nice and soft and unusable, is my best proposal.
Contact GeneralE, I think he would know what to do and what is possible. |
|
|
07/22/2016 11:29:56 AM · #4 |
Just wanted to add that iPhone currently has a billboard campaign featuring images taken on iPhones. So yes, it can be done. |
|
|
07/22/2016 11:42:19 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by tanguera: So she wants you to take a photo of a photo...?
You might want to shoot Brent_S a message. He does a lot of upsampling and huge prints. I'm pretty sure he does it with captures from a DSLR.
But I'd have to ask, how is she going to present an 8x10 foot photo....??? |
It's not a photo, it's a computer printout of a painting... and she's not looking for photo quality. ...more of a x-large poster. How she's going to present it, I don't know, I'll find out...
Message edited by author 2016-07-22 11:49:21. |
|
|
07/22/2016 11:48:59 AM · #6 |
I enlarge images all the time in prepress.
Photoshop's enlargement options are much better than they used to be.
|
|
|
07/22/2016 12:30:35 PM · #7 |
The thing that you need to consider is that most large prints are not intended to be see really close anyway. If you look at a billboard close up, for example, it it isn't photo quality.
But the method for enlarging is still important. |
|
|
07/22/2016 12:31:56 PM · #8 |
I have more information:
this is for a presentation of only two people. The job we are bidding is an antebellum bank building on the national historic register. It is going to be a museum showcasing furniture and decorative pieces of that era. The image on the paper needs to look really good because the actual wallpaper will cost around $100,000 and the whole point at this stage is to show it will be worth the cost.
More than likely double sided tape. I was thinking FSC Certified papers.
We can go smaller in size. If 6x8 works the best then I'll go with it. I'm more concerned about image quality than size.
|
|
|
07/22/2016 12:34:13 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by tate: The thing that you need to consider is that most large prints are not intended to be see really close anyway. If you look at a billboard close up, for example, it it isn't photo quality.
But the method for enlarging is still important. |
Yeah, Looks like I'm going to have to find her a happy medium, so to speak. |
|
|
07/22/2016 12:58:14 PM · #10 |
Why couldn't you just photoshop the image you're discussing into an image of the building to show what it would look like? Then blow that up to a 3'x4' (or larger) poster size so that it is impressive.
I cannot imagine the difficulties she will encounter trying to stick an image that size onto a wall. If it's not perfectly attached and buckles or wrinkles anywhere, it will be a disaster. Not to mention that I don't know if there's a tape strong enough to hold up the weight of that much paper....
Message edited by author 2016-07-22 13:00:15. |
|
|
07/22/2016 01:15:14 PM · #11 |
You might look into a company that prints signs and banners -- many signs and billboards are now printed onto fabric or non-tearing paper of some kind. And as mentioned, intended viewing distance determines required resolution. |
|
|
07/22/2016 01:21:50 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Why couldn't you just photoshop the image you're discussing into an image of the building to show what it would look like? Then blow that up to a 3'x4' (or larger) poster size so that it is impressive.
I cannot imagine the difficulties she will encounter trying to stick an image that size onto a wall. If it's not perfectly attached and buckles or wrinkles anywhere, it will be a disaster. Not to mention that I don't know if there's a tape strong enough to hold up the weight of that much paper.... |
That's actually a REALLY good idea. |
|
|
07/22/2016 04:26:48 PM · #13 |
I have a program... darnsies... what's it called? that upscales photos... multiplying the pixels.
|
|
|
07/22/2016 08:07:23 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by Lydia: I have a program... darnsies... what's it called? that upscales photos... multiplying the pixels. |
On-1's Perfect Resize?
A decent free program is Smilla Enlarger |
|
|
07/22/2016 08:27:32 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by Lydia: I have a program... darnsies... what's it called? that upscales photos... multiplying the pixels. |
On-1's Perfect Resize?
A decent free program is Smilla Enlarger |
noo... that's not it.
It's on another computer.
Grrr... My mind is old.
But, my body is even older. *sigh*
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 06:16:23 PM EDT.