Author | Thread |
|
10/26/2007 03:55:11 PM · #1 |
If this has already been discussed somebody please direct me to the thread, I couldn't find anything like this when I was searching. I was wondering if there is a specific reason why the pictures don't have the settings with them when we are voting. Sometimes when I am giving feedback, it would be helpful to know what their shutter speed was, or what their aperture was, or their ISO, so I can give better suggestions. Especially some of the out of focus shots, it would help to know if it was because of camera shake, due to a slow shutter speed, or maybe a dof problem, etc. I know we have to submit that information when we put up our pictures for the challenge, so why can't we see it in voting?
|
|
|
10/26/2007 04:02:22 PM · #2 |
Probably has been brought up before, but yeah it would be nice to see. |
|
|
10/26/2007 05:05:58 PM · #3 |
What I have been doing with some images that I am curious about is to save the photo to my desktop and then look at the advanced tab on the properties.Some of the photos show the exif data like that.
|
|
|
10/26/2007 05:53:12 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by travis_cooper: I know we have to submit that information when we put up our pictures for the challenge, so why can't we see it in voting? |
Probably because if we see "ISO 25600" it narrows it down to just the Nikon D3 owners. :) |
|
|
10/26/2007 06:55:57 PM · #5 |
You're voting on the IMAGE, not the camera settings used to achieve the image.
|
|
|
10/26/2007 07:21:56 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate: You're voting on the IMAGE, not the camera settings used to achieve the image. |
I think everyone knows that, he just meant for commenting purposes. But I think it's fine the way it is. If it's terribly blurry then just post a "Either you suck or your camera sucks." comment. |
|
|
10/26/2007 11:01:10 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by kevinlg: What I have been doing with some images that I am curious about is to save the photo to my desktop and then look at the advanced tab on the properties.Some of the photos show the exif data like that. |
Yeah I have done that before too, but it would just be nicer if the info was just right there. I can understand if there are reasons not to show it, I was just curious.
Originally posted by jhonan: Probably because if we see "ISO 25600" it narrows it down to just the Nikon D3 owners. :)
|
Wow, there is a camera that goes that high? How is the image even worth using, I would imagine there would be so much "noise" it would be worthless.
|
|
|
10/26/2007 11:16:33 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by travis_cooper:
Wow, there is a camera that goes that high? How is the image even worth using, I would imagine there would be so much "noise" it would be worthless. |
Bottom of the page should answer you question.
//ishootshows.com/2007/09/02/nikon-d3-iso-25600-samples-from-ifa/ |
|
|
10/27/2007 10:22:27 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by travis_cooper:
Wow, there is a camera that goes that high? How is the image even worth using, I would imagine there would be so much "noise" it would be worthless. |
A magic, invisible camera that has only been rumored to exist! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 09:44:45 AM EDT.