| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
09/19/2006 05:46:01 PM |
| Smart & Light-Hearted! Cool! |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/19/2006 04:56:50 PM |
| Nice work on lighting - I like the "bright outline" effect. Interesting composition. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/17/2006 09:44:04 PM |
| I'm not quite sure how this relates to chemistry. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/16/2006 03:08:12 AM |
| great lighting...I usually love negative space, but wonder how this would have lookd as a close up square crop...just a thought... great use of back lighting |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/14/2006 03:03:57 PM |
| ok, first off, this picture has very little or no relation to the competition topic. Secondly, as I'm sure others have said, this picture seems to appear TWICE in the competition, even if it does have slightly altered positions. However, I give it a 8 for composotion. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/14/2006 12:55:48 PM |
| Nice shot, doesn't really say chemistry to me. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 08:53:42 PM |
| Nice look on his face. Is this the same model from the other one very similar to this? hmmmm |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 04:06:31 PM |
| great expression, cool backlighting. good use of negative space. a tad sharper around the eyes and this would be flawless. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 02:33:11 PM |
| Yes the image is amusing and well worked but I think that is out of the contest. Where is the chemistry? I think that the lamp on without electrical source can be the new idea but isn't many obvious. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 10:01:02 AM |
| This image is better than the other image with the same model. Even so, this is a weak subject for this challenge, as it doesn't relate to chemistry very well. In a more subject appropriate challenge, I would have given this image a 6 or 7 for the lighting and other technical merits. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 09:55:37 AM |
| More like physics old son - check your curriculum and go back to school. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 08:32:54 AM |
| Is this the same shoot as the other one? Well I'll repeat my comment then. The light bulb/electricity is physics rather than chemistry, but I do like how the backlighting catches the hair. I think this photo's composition is better than the other one too. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 06:39:43 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 04:22:58 AM |
| I cannot really understand how this meet the challenge |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 03:32:18 AM |
| don't see the connection to chemistry |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
09/13/2006 01:17:55 AM |
| I'm not a great fan your concept, but the image is good. Great backlighting to create the halo, specially needed at the back of his head, well done. The composition works and it's easy to understand the image. Sharpness colours and lighting all comes to gether to make a strong image. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/28/2024 02:19:52 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
