| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/06/2010 01:21:54 PM |
| Amazing. Amazing. Amazing. I can't believe this didn't ribbon. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/06/2010 12:13:33 AM |
| Very well executed and awesome composition. Congratulations on your top ten placement. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/05/2010 03:55:22 PM |
| Excelent execution and control of the light especially considering the table was exposed 4 times (unless you covered it?) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/05/2010 03:25:30 AM |
| Great result man, and a big 'Booooooo' to all the people claiming it's more than two exposures. For all they know, you could have an identical twin! Way to go. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
05/04/2010 10:54:42 PM |
| Amazing shot!. Very well executed. My only nit pick would be a little more light on the pants. Great job! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/04/2010 10:51:52 AM |
| Interesting and clever shot! A little dark in exposure (as well as tone). However, -2 for doing four exposures instead of a double exposure. Bummer because I'm sure this took a LOT of work to do!!! 7-2 = 5 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/04/2010 10:06:40 AM |
| One of my favorites of the challenge so far... Great work 10 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/03/2010 01:05:24 PM |
| I like this. Great idea and great execution (no pun intended). |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/03/2010 04:16:39 AM |
| 4 heads are better than one! Nice job. 8 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/03/2010 12:32:51 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/30/2010 07:12:20 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/29/2010 11:11:23 PM |
| kind of Dexter like -- neat |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/29/2010 10:05:00 PM |
| The effect is just awesome. A bit out of focus, but given the conditions, really well done. Eerie. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/29/2010 06:36:31 PM |
| less contrast would help. nice idea! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/29/2010 12:06:16 PM |
| I would like to see a bit more negative space on top but given the average quality of the challenge I cannot do this picture justice with anything below 9*. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/29/2010 08:22:29 AM |
| Holy shit! 10 10 10 10 I wish I could vote for 20! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/29/2010 04:43:22 AM |
| not voting right now but there is a good chance that you exposed more than twice ?? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/28/2010 10:33:47 PM |
| I like this, but is this a double exposure |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/28/2010 08:58:36 AM |
| Very nice work... but there are more than two exposures... 5 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/28/2010 02:48:31 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/28/2010 12:06:56 AM |
| Nice idea and execution. But this seems like 4 exposures and not a double "2" exposure(s). |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 05:19:30 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
