Nightbulb
by scalvert

Comment:
As far as I am concerned, what is the difference with this shot and taking multiple exposures? It is EXTREMLEY easy to create surreal images with multiple exposures.

Sorry doesn't seem like it is "pure" enough for my liking.

Not a bad shot (hell I even _like_it_), but seems like "cheating" to me.

Escaping Soul
by sammy_stecchino

Comment:
Over-tweaked image. This appears to violate the Basic Editing rule: I quote:

"Filters: The use of filters (or non-Photoshop equivalent) is strictly limited. Any filter or stand-alone utility designed and used to preserve the integrity of the image and/or reduce the effects of noise, scratches, etc, are permitted. These include but are not limited to the Sharpen, Unsharp Mask, and Dust & Scratches filters, and standalone image cleanup utilities such as NeatImage. However, no effects filters may be applied to your image, with the exception of Noise and Gaussian Blur, which are allowed. Any filter permitted by this rule must be applied uniformly to the entire image. Selective application of any filter is prohibited."

son of woman
by Seanachai

Comment:
Nice job.

Cars at the Lightshow
by cycon

Comment:
Abstract yes, Surreal no.

Me, myself and I
by Nuno

Comment:
disturbing, really.

Through the eyes of a D2X
by DingleBerry

Comment:
worst picture yet, and I have seen more than I would have cared to.

The madonna of the leaves and rain (2005)
by whiteroom

Comment:
Nice image.

The Martini Monster
by TommyMoe21

Comment:
Pretty surreal.

Young Darwin’s apocryphal vision
by jjbeguin

Comment:
pretty good.

Phantasm
by rblanton

Comment:
Abstract does not equal Surreal I am afraid.