Image |
Comment |
| 08/23/2007 12:45:03 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/23/2007 12:44:31 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/23/2007 12:43:45 PM |
Live and Let Dieby Mr_PantsComment: I love this picture, but it doesn't really show the bird's wings so I can't give you a 10. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2007 10:49:20 AM |
Which Way Joséby lynnesiteComment: I love this picture, although the spacing feels a little off - like there's no real way to make this fit the rule of thirds. It seems a little too close to the center the way it is because the wings are so much bigger than the body, but if it were farther towards the edge I don't think it would have looked right either. May have been better as a freestudy entry, but congrats on the top 10 anyway! It's a great shot, rule of thirds or not. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/08/2007 04:26:49 PM |
The Prophet by Joey LawrenceComment: lol, I JUST searched for the Cannon 85mm 1.8 lens and then read the last comment you got from Mark Simms... The pictures are amazing. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2007 12:09:16 PM |
My Beautiful Belleby TheStickComment: Awww, looks just like my dog Bryher when I got him! Now he's 2 1/2. See him here: www.dogster.com/?67522 (he's also featured in many of my portfolio pictures).
As for technical comments - the picture is a bit out of focus, the background is distracting, and there are a few color problems. I'd lighten shadows, darken highlights, and increase both midtone and overall contrast. Then turn down the saturation a bit (you might even desat the magenta channel completely). The background isn't great - I personally often like backgrounds in shots to give them context, but by and large the DPC voters don't (I've been bashed many a time) so it might be better to take a lower angle and get only the sky behind the dog or put the dog in front of something more neutral (like a wall). Even though I like stuff in the background, this one is problematic because it's so much brighter than the dog that it steals attention - you might want to burn it to make it less noticable, or apply a blur effect to it (but select out the dog first so the dog doesn't get more blurred). Then the photo needs some sharpening - it would probably be most effective to sharpen just the face and chest, but USM over the whole thing would be okay, too. In the future, this type of picture would work best when the dog is looking at the light rather than backlit because you lose his/her features (you could also use a reflector, but if your dog is like mine, who has time to set one up when the dog's running all over). |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/21/2006 04:05:12 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/21/2006 04:04:52 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/21/2006 04:03:50 PM |
"Goodbye Blue Sky"by FleaNZComment: Why include the streetlight? Was there anything you could have done that was not lit that would have given a silouette (sp?)? |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/21/2006 04:03:17 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/03/2025 05:08:33 PM EDT.