My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by BIGPOLEHERBEAR:
I'd just like to thank you for the nice comment you left for me.I can't believe i have met so many rude people all in one place.I appreciate nice coments like yours,shows you have class and respect for other people,thanx again,and have a nice day

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by graphicfunk:
Lovely girl with such fine liquid eyes.

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by gsquiggle:
awww.. cutie.

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by aboutimage:
I'm guessing by now you're probably getting beat up for your "richness of family" concept. It's not affecting my scoring process. I think it's a cute picture, but I think the blown highlights in the top right detract a lot from it. My eye keeps wandering back there.

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by Xilebo:
And you are a wealthy person indeed :)

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by RKT:
Hmmm...cute indeed...but lets think about this...the challenge states "The opposite of the poverty challenge. Knock us out with your representation of material wealth" I know this is trying to step "out of the box" I suppose, I hate the term "out of the box", and I'm not a complete stickler for challnge descriptions but...if we go by what the challenge is seeking, this is what this image says to me...those without children are "poor" in a sense and a child is a "material" possesion...yes I understand what you are trying to convey but there is a difference between "think out of the box" and being no where close to said box...the art of thinking "out of the box" is being able to stay on topic, and not to change the topic the to fit in your own box.

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by TheStick:
What a doll! Beautiful eyes!

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by stphq:
wouldn't fit my interpretation of "material wealth",,,, lol... but hey, great photo...

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by Rikki:
I see your POV here. Children are indeed precious wealths we all share.

My Affluence
by Emmy

Comment by FotoMunki:
Lovely shot.