Drops of Jupiter- Trainby
marboComment by jimmsp: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) â A fairly centered, single object. I think the photo would have improved by shifting the planet up and to the right some (the infamous rule of thirds guideline). But I think it would help here. What is possibly out of your control is what else gets included. I am thinking specifically of a few stars. Would be the âdropsâ in the title. You noted that the moons were not included.
(2) BACKGROUND â Without the stars, the empty space is clearly good ânegative spaceâ.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â For we amateurs, this is a very good photo of Jupiter. For this challenge, almost everybody wants to see the main subject in focus and without noise. The handholding may have hurt a tad at 1/30 sec.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â Looks pretty good to me. You may have improved the image quality by reducing the noise in the image, either via Photoshop or another program like Neat Image. The rules say âAny filter or stand-alone utility designed and used to preserve the integrity of the image and/or reduce the effects of noise, scratches, etc, are permitted. These include but are not limited to the Sharpen, Unsharp Mask, and Dust & Scratches filters, and standalone image cleanup utilities such as NeatImage.â
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â You went for a very literal interpretation of the song title â and produced a very good photo of Jupiter. Itâs unlikely anyone else here could duplicate it or better it by shooting from home. A very good result on a difficult project. However, as I said above, the clarity of it hurts you in this challenge. The noise and the blur on the outer edge â when compared to the other photos of earth bound objects â reduce the score. If this were a science project, you would have scored high (in my opinion).
Jim msp