Image |
Comment |
| 05/10/2010 04:05:25 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/08/2010 12:38:27 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/08/2010 12:12:31 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/05/2010 06:59:48 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/05/2010 12:13:58 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/05/2010 12:13:52 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2010 10:05:06 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/03/2010 04:40:00 PM |
bucolicby krnodilComment by tnun: My comment was way too brief - nothing was blown out in your picture, and the extraordinary contrast is delightfully and subtly complemented by the variations within each "zone." |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/03/2010 11:27:37 AM |
bucolicby krnodilComment by RKT: For the life of me, I can't figure out why so many see this as blown out/over exposed. I can't! Or maybe people weren't using the proper terminology? Perhaps "pale" might have been a better term...but then again, "pale" is not a flaw...and one must always seek the flaw when looking at a photograph.
...or, maybe some serious monitor calibrations are in order for some of the viewing/voting population. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/03/2010 10:55:44 AM |
bucolicby krnodilComment by skewsme: beautiful! funny I was just thinking that it reminds me of tnun's entry - as if part of a series. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2025 04:47:42 PM EDT.