Image |
Comment |
| 09/24/2009 10:19:37 AM |
Rulerby marcusvdtComment by dahkota: I love the processing you did and the tones are wonderful. But I wonder at the composition, at how the lines seem to be randomly placed in the frame. The base lines (looks like the back of a guitar) lead me off an abyss at the back. There is a beautiful curve, but its strength is over powered by the strong diagonal of the tape measure so the curve just kind of dies back at the abyss. The diagonal crosses in front of me, blocking me rather than leading me into the image. I seem to be entering the image from the lower right, where the strong black spot is and where the lines are straight forward and I don't think that is where you intended me to be. Hope that makes sense... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/23/2009 01:52:26 AM |
Rulerby marcusvdtComment by Bugzeye: I think moving the tape measure casing more towards the center of image would have given the effect of greater DOF. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/13/2009 08:22:03 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/12/2009 03:05:24 PM |
New toolsby marcusvdtComment by fitz3000: I don't know why you haven't put/or taken a shot with your camera making the crayons be in the middle |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/09/2009 08:31:46 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/11/2009 07:04:49 PM |
Le Cock after sunsetby marcusvdtComment by bassbone: Marcus - another couple thoughts to ponder
On the shots that you highlighted in the thread about previously "snapshots" that won ribbons, those shots were taken around 2003 and early 2005. The details and lighting were not as flat in those images and the eagle had some attitude and the other bird was just plain unusual looking.
If you notice the recent high scoring bird shots including the current Red ribbon winner in the FS, there are no longer 'snaps' but actual portraits. The are composed wonderfully, with rich tones and fantastic lighting. The shots that score well with this type of image, especially birds, are those that display some character. A sideways shot of a chicken is just that, but a shot of an eagle open beaked and screaming at us will get our attention.
If you want to compare a similar bird to your shot of the chicken, I would recommend the excellent photo that noraneko took here:
The bokeh is butter smooth and rich, the details in the chicken make you feel you can reach out and touch the animal, and the composition with the lovely lines and curves drives our eyes around the scene.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/11/2009 06:57:13 PM |
Le Cock after sunsetby marcusvdtComment by AP: I agree with everything Tez said, I'll add that the composition leaves a lot to be desired... The head is centered, which is usually ensures boring-ness unless it is creatively/effectively used... There is too much negative space- bokeh is nice but there is too much of it, and the neck is cropped strangely. You really have to be aware of everything that you put into the frame, and only keep things that ADD to the image. Lastly, the lighting is flat.
In sum, this photograph is nothing more than a 'snapshot' - all you seemed to have done (from a viewer's perspective) was point a camera at a chicken and take a shot, which just wont cut it when photographing wildlife.
I would recommend looking at the wildlife challenges or in the nature galleries to see what makes for interesting animal shots. Some recurring themes you'll see in the best ones are CLOSE-UP shots, very shallow DoF, interesting lighting, unique poses/compositions, and exceptionally sharp quality. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/11/2009 06:19:59 PM |
Le Cock after sunsetby marcusvdtComment by Tez: well, if it's meant to be in French it should be 'Le Coq'.
Basically this image does zero for me. Its like a snapshot rather than an artistic creation. If the bird was doing something more then standing there then maybe it would hold my attention for more than 5 seconds- 1 second to realise its a bird and 4 seconds to look to see if it is just a picture of a chicken or if there's something i'm missing because I presumed there would be something very interesting about this chicken that warranted its picture being taken and its entry into a challenge.
Your camera did a nice job of exposing correctly though and the bokeh is kinda nice but as to how many of these are the result of the camera or the person holding the camera is subject to interpretation.
In summary- its a snapshot of a chicken that I think anyone could have taken.
Then again, I'm not sure how you can really improve on it- perhaps by showing more of the bird doing whatever it's doing, or waiting for it to do somehting interesting because in all honesty, this could have been taken in a museum. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/07/2009 04:53:25 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/03/2009 09:44:22 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/03/2025 07:14:38 PM EDT.