Author | Thread |
|
02/23/2006 02:40:37 AM · #1 |
I just purchased the Time Machine to use as a remote trigger. Here is my first attempt to capture a popping balloon. The flash was triggered with a microphone reacting to the balloon's pop
Has anyone else used this device?
|
|
|
02/23/2006 02:45:58 AM · #2 |
hmm, maybe a faster shutter speed + ISO would help?
EDIT: silly me, I thought it was controlled by camera settings. Now I realize it's not (hit head on the wall)
Message edited by author 2006-02-23 03:03:22. |
|
|
02/23/2006 02:59:35 AM · #3 |
There is no control over the shutter speed. It is a dark room exposed only for the duration of the flash itself. The time of the event is incredibly fast. So fast that if you place the microphone 8 feet away instead of 4 feet so the flash if fired later by the time it takes sound to travel 4 feet the balloon is completely collapsed. Using a speed of sound of 1100 feet/sec that mean it takes about 4/1100 ~ 3 or 4 miliseconds to collapse the balloon. Since the flash duration is ~ 1/6 of a milisecond it seems to me that the balloon will collapse about 5% during the actual flash so there is significant movement. I am going to try to reduce the flash duration by using lower power to see if I can actually freeze the motion.
I am very much on a learning curve here and am not really asking people about the quality of the image but what experience they have trying to capture high speed events.
|
|
|
02/23/2006 03:05:38 AM · #4 |
I have always liked these sort of "high speed frozen" photos, since back in the days when I looked at photos of bullets going through an apple, or a bursting baloon from a needle prick...
Can the light go any faster? Maybe set it to the fastest, but I'm not sure if you camera is sensitive enough to pick it up. Again, maybe a higher ISO may help?
Cant wait to see more from you! |
|
|
02/23/2006 03:40:48 AM · #5 |
Ok here is another attempt. I cut the AB400 to 1/32 power which should cut the flash time significantly, boosted ISO to 400 and opened up the aperture from f/22 to f/11. Motion is definitely reduced and the image is sharper but significantly underexposed. Back to the drawing board :-)
|
|
|
02/23/2006 03:56:47 AM · #6 |
What is the temp in the room you are shooting in relation to speed of sound?
68deg = 343.59999999999996 m/s or 1127.2965879265091 ft/s (speed of sound)
72deg = 344.95555555555555 m/s or 1131.7439486730823 ft/s (speed of sound)
|
|
|
02/23/2006 04:07:10 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by southern_exposure: What is the temp in the room you are shooting in relation to speed of sound?
68deg = 343.59999999999996 m/s or 1127.2965879265091 ft/s (speed of sound)
72deg = 344.95555555555555 m/s or 1131.7439486730823 ft/s (speed of sound) |
Guess i was in a cold room huh :-)
|
|
|
02/23/2006 02:10:05 PM · #8 |
Thought you may find this helpful.
|
|
|
02/23/2006 02:33:10 PM · #9 |
my AB400 never was faster than 2ms /flash even at lowest power
the fastest flash i have is a SB80dx at ~60us at 1/128 power
and it is still too slow for many images ...
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 08:10:32 AM EDT.