DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> Questionable methods of this photographer (Jill Greenberg)
Pages:  
Showing posts 176 - 200 of 285, (reverse)
AuthorThread
05/18/2006 11:43:36 PM · #176
Originally posted by amandalore:

alright.... killed this thread too I suppose... :)


This thread was akready dead. Art dug it up to play with it's corpse a bit.
05/18/2006 11:56:44 PM · #177
lovely of you to assume she deliberately made a child cry. Amazing really, Those of you that assume she must have MADE them cry probably have children or photgraph children that are used to a camera and yourself. I have witnessed many an occassion where a child taken to a studio by mummy and daddy in the hope that they will come home with some lovely memories of their little angels only to discover the child screams the whole time or at least gets upset initially. If the photographer had the foresight to be ready to capture these very real images of the terrible 2's n 3's then kudos to her. Do you really think she made them cry for her own gain? all I can say is PUHLEASE
05/18/2006 11:58:29 PM · #178
Originally posted by overclover:

lovely of you to assume she deliberately made a child cry. Amazing really, Those of you that assume she must have MADE them cry probably have children or photgraph children that are used to a camera and yourself. I have witnessed many an occassion where a child taken to a studio by mummy and daddy in the hope that they will come home with some lovely memories of their little angels only to discover the child screams the whole time or at least gets upset initially. If the photographer had the foresight to be ready to capture these very real images of the terrible 2's n 3's then kudos to her. Do you really think she made them cry for her own gain? all I can say is PUHLEASE


first note: I don't care what she does, but before you get hammered, I just wanted to say that the photographer said she gives them candy and then takes it away to make them cry
05/18/2006 11:59:13 PM · #179
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Originally posted by amandalore:

alright.... killed this thread too I suppose... :)


This thread was akready dead. Art dug it up to play with it's corpse a bit.


don't ruin it for me, I'm on a roll... of thread killing
05/19/2006 12:01:16 AM · #180
Originally posted by overclover:

lovely of you to assume she deliberately made a child cry. Amazing really, Those of you that assume she must have MADE them cry probably have children or photgraph children that are used to a camera and yourself. I have witnessed many an occassion where a child taken to a studio by mummy and daddy in the hope that they will come home with some lovely memories of their little angels only to discover the child screams the whole time or at least gets upset initially. If the photographer had the foresight to be ready to capture these very real images of the terrible 2's n 3's then kudos to her. Do you really think she made them cry for her own gain? all I can say is PUHLEASE


If you'd read the article, you'd have seen that SHE says she made them cry.
05/19/2006 12:06:40 AM · #181
The children I photographed were not harmed in any way. And, as a mother, I am quite aware of how easily toddlers can cry. Storms of grief sweep across their features without warning; a joyful smile can dissolve into a grimace of despair. The first little boy I shot, Liam, suddenly became hysterically upset. a direct quote from the photographer herself ... please show me where she says she MADE them cry
05/19/2006 12:14:04 AM · #182
even if she did make them cry, it's not like she beat them! people need to learn that kids cry and get hurt, and it's ok.

I mean seriously, if one kid out of a million kids hurts themselves on a swing, or gravel in a park, or some kid choked themself with a toy, then they ban it for everyone else. to me, that's just natural selection or a huge freak accident, we had swings and slides and played dodgeball as kids, and I don't know any kid who died.

you can't just put people in bubblewrap for the rest of their lives, what happens when it comes time for them to learn how to live?

just saying that it is ok for kids to cry, especially if they are crying over candy, that just says spoiled brat to me.

Edit to add: ok that was harsh, I'm not a horrible person, really, I just think people get too worked up over stuff like this.

Message edited by author 2006-05-19 00:18:37.
05/20/2006 09:53:30 PM · #183
Originally posted by overclover:

The children I photographed were not harmed in any way. And, as a mother, I am quite aware of how easily toddlers can cry. Storms of grief sweep across their features without warning; a joyful smile can dissolve into a grimace of despair. The first little boy I shot, Liam, suddenly became hysterically upset. a direct quote from the photographer herself ... please show me where she says she MADE them cry


That's not the same press release that was there earlier. Note this thread started April 18 and that's dated April 28. After reading it once I didn't go back to check if it had been changed, sorry. You're right, it doesn't say anything about that.... NOW.
09/14/2008 12:21:34 PM · #184
Bringing up old dead thread but I found this article:

PDN article

and is it no surprise that she makes children cry just to get a photo? I remembered seeing this thread and wondering about her motivations. And now I look at her comments in this article and wonder about her level of professionalism.
09/14/2008 12:40:18 PM · #185
Gee this woman sounds like an artist to me, and a successful one at that. Aren't artists supposed to take a different view of the world, to force us to examine our preconceived notions about the world around us? I guess i just don't get all the drama over this. My kids certainly would not have been traumatized by anything here as they are upset about just about everything that happens so this would just be one more thing to scream about(3 year olds LOVE to scream about stuff).
09/14/2008 12:55:30 PM · #186
Originally posted by colorcarnival:

Bringing up old dead thread but I found this article:

PDN article

and is it no surprise that she makes children cry just to get a photo? I remembered seeing this thread and wondering about her motivations. And now I look at her comments in this article and wonder about her level of professionalism.


Her level of professionalism is low. She's an artist.
09/14/2008 12:57:04 PM · #187
There's no doubt that she is successful - look at the jobs she has gotten. I think I saw some photos that she did in TIME of one of the Olympic athletes. And then she got this one-on-one with McCain. I read the comments she made and am surprised with her glee at trying to make a not so flattering photo. To make these comments publicly like this just seems very unprofessional to me.
09/14/2008 01:18:50 PM · #188
Originally posted by colorcarnival:

There's no doubt that she is successful - look at the jobs she has gotten. I think I saw some photos that she did in TIME of one of the Olympic athletes. And then she got this one-on-one with McCain. I read the comments she made and am surprised with her glee at trying to make a not so flattering photo. To make these comments publicly like this just seems very unprofessional to me.


I haven't done enough (read "any") research on this person to know what she's like, but artists can be dicks. That's one of the first things you learn in Art History (I know because all I learned was the first things).

hahahahaha :D
09/14/2008 01:24:50 PM · #189
Originally posted by posthumous:

I haven't done enough (read "any") research on this person to know what she's like, but artists can be dicks. That's one of the first things you learn in Art History (I know because all I learned was the first things).

hahahahaha :D


lol... well I never took Art History but it sounds like they packed a lot of info right into the beginning for ya :D
09/14/2008 02:07:23 PM · #190
Originally posted by colorcarnival:

Bringing up old dead thread but I found this article:

PDN article

and is it no surprise that she makes children cry just to get a photo? I remembered seeing this thread and wondering about her motivations. And now I look at her comments in this article and wonder about her level of professionalism.


Goodness. I am looking forward to seeing the individuals on dpc who supported a photographer being sued a few months ago because she didn't want to shoot a gay wedding due to her religious beliefs condemn Jill Greenberg for deliberately attempting to make someone look bad in a photo simply because of her political beliefs.

Message edited by author 2008-09-14 14:09:20.
09/14/2008 03:12:59 PM · #191
Originally posted by jhomrighaus:

Gee this woman sounds like an artist to me, and a successful one at that. Aren't artists supposed to take a different view of the world, to force us to examine our preconceived notions about the world around us? I guess i just don't get all the drama over this. My kids certainly would not have been traumatized by anything here as they are upset about just about everything that happens so this would just be one more thing to scream about(3 year olds LOVE to scream about stuff).

I take exception to that comment "3 year olds LOVE to scream about stuff".

That's a broad, sweeping, and in my experience, untrue statement, and at best, a rationale.

It's one thing to have an arrangement with a model to achieve an end result for your image.

It takes a special kind of soulless selfishness to play indiscriminately with the feelings of small children who couldn't possibly understand.
09/14/2008 03:32:01 PM · #192
Originally posted by Phil:

Originally posted by colorcarnival:

Bringing up old dead thread but I found this article:

PDN article

and is it no surprise that she makes children cry just to get a photo? I remembered seeing this thread and wondering about her motivations. And now I look at her comments in this article and wonder about her level of professionalism.


Goodness. I am looking forward to seeing the individuals on dpc who supported a photographer being sued a few months ago because she didn't want to shoot a gay wedding due to her religious beliefs condemn Jill Greenberg for deliberately attempting to make someone look bad in a photo simply because of her political beliefs.


I know I'm slightly dehydrated and need some sleep right now, but I can not honestly see the connection you are making here. or why.
09/14/2008 03:46:48 PM · #193
I just finished photographing 340 preschoolers in 4 days. Kids cry all the time. Its not a big deal. I particularly like some of the crying shots.
09/14/2008 03:48:47 PM · #194
Maybe it's a big deal, maybe not. But I wouldn't like myself very much if I did that to an any-year old.
09/14/2008 03:54:14 PM · #195
Originally posted by karmat:

Originally posted by Phil:

Originally posted by colorcarnival:

Bringing up old dead thread but I found this article:

PDN article

and is it no surprise that she makes children cry just to get a photo? I remembered seeing this thread and wondering about her motivations. And now I look at her comments in this article and wonder about her level of professionalism.


Goodness. I am looking forward to seeing the individuals on dpc who supported a photographer being sued a few months ago because she didn't want to shoot a gay wedding due to her religious beliefs condemn Jill Greenberg for deliberately attempting to make someone look bad in a photo simply because of her political beliefs.


I know I'm slightly dehydrated and need some sleep right now, but I can not honestly see the connection you are making here. or why.


Did you click the link in the post I replied to?

The connection is that they say it is unethical and illegal to turn down business based on your religious beliefs. I just wonder if the same people will condemn Jill Greenberg for deliberately attempting to make McCain look bad (like that takes a lot of work heh heh) based on her political beliefs.
09/14/2008 03:56:25 PM · #196
//americandigest.org/mt-archives/bad_americans/the_atlantic_mo.php

Ethics and the this woman's name should never even be in the same book, let alone sentence.
09/14/2008 06:55:41 PM · #197
Originally posted by traser:

//americandigest.org/mt-archives/bad_americans/the_atlantic_mo.php

Ethics and the this woman's name should never even be in the same book, let alone sentence.

Great article.

I don't think anyone would be unclear about which direction this woman's career is likely to go.
09/14/2008 06:57:37 PM · #198
Originally posted by trnqlty:

I just finished photographing 340 preschoolers in 4 days. Kids cry all the time. Its not a big deal. I particularly like some of the crying shots.

Well, yeah it is a big deal......most decent, compassionate people don't seem to want to make, or see little kids cry.

If you do, I think you'll find yourself in a minority.
09/14/2008 07:09:14 PM · #199
Originally posted by Phil:

Originally posted by karmat:

Originally posted by Phil:

Originally posted by colorcarnival:

Bringing up old dead thread but I found this article:

PDN article

and is it no surprise that she makes children cry just to get a photo? I remembered seeing this thread and wondering about her motivations. And now I look at her comments in this article and wonder about her level of professionalism.


Goodness. I am looking forward to seeing the individuals on dpc who supported a photographer being sued a few months ago because she didn't want to shoot a gay wedding due to her religious beliefs condemn Jill Greenberg for deliberately attempting to make someone look bad in a photo simply because of her political beliefs.


I know I'm slightly dehydrated and need some sleep right now, but I can not honestly see the connection you are making here. or why.


Did you click the link in the post I replied to?

The connection is that they say it is unethical and illegal to turn down business based on your religious beliefs. I just wonder if the same people will condemn Jill Greenberg for deliberately attempting to make McCain look bad (like that takes a lot of work heh heh) based on her political beliefs.


Ah. Okay.
09/14/2008 07:11:30 PM · #200
Considering how this woman treats kids, what she did to McCain is not a surprise. I am a bit surprised that she actually put those shots on her site and are the first ones you see.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 06:39:24 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 06:39:24 PM EDT.