Author | Thread |
|
09/18/2006 02:52:58 PM · #351 |
WOW! Great job for only having the lights a week. Excellent light quality.
|
|
|
09/18/2006 03:32:30 PM · #352 |
Originally posted by albc28:
Can anyone give me tips on skin smoothing techniques? |
Makeup helps to hide blemishes, but it can only go so far hiding texture. Temperature is a big thing. Too cold and too windy and you'll get bumpy. Too hot like when shooting flood lights and you'll get sweat and open pores.
Direction of your light helps. Don't rake the light in order to minimize texture. Diffusion works too.
Personally I'm not a fan of using gaussian blur during processing - leaves the skin looking plasticy. Noise reduction techniques work the same way. You're better off using clone stamp to get rid of blemishes individually and to maintain as much original skin detail as possible.
|
|
|
09/18/2006 11:12:53 PM · #353 |
wow...just found this link and wanted to shoot a quick BIG thank you to Idnic for starting this thread and teaching me so much!!!! ty ty ty :-) |
|
|
09/19/2006 12:23:24 AM · #354 |
Originally posted by idnic: WOW! Great job for only having the lights a week. Excellent light quality. |
thanks Cindi and well thanks for starting this thread. I learnt quiet a lot from this thread. |
|
|
09/19/2006 01:36:30 AM · #355 |
Are these good examples of portraiture....I would like to know so that I can work on making better ones.
|
|
|
09/20/2006 08:16:16 PM · #356 |
Bump!
Thanks for this thread... I'm learning loads! |
|
|
09/20/2006 08:35:50 PM · #357 |
Nice thread! I'll be watching |
|
|
09/20/2006 08:50:45 PM · #358 |
|
|
09/22/2006 08:22:26 AM · #359 |
I added a couple of photos from my first shoot and also changed the edit of a couple. Comments would be greatly appreciated as that i have another one on Sept. 30th (this one will probably be outside though). Thanks

Message edited by author 2006-09-22 08:24:03. |
|
|
09/22/2006 09:54:22 AM · #360 |
Anthony, looks like you softened the skin a bit with the re-edit. I like it. Not too much, but enough to smooth a bit.
As for the next shoot - start a file with pages from magazines & such of poses you like and might want to try. You can show those to your model and let her choose looks that she likes. That way you & she both know what you're trying to accomplish. It will make her feel involved in the process, thus more comfortable and will give you one less thing to worry about. :)
|
|
|
09/22/2006 02:32:31 PM · #361 |
A question about the shutter speed. Since my 30D can do Xsync of 1/250s, I assume I can't have shutter speeds faster than 1/250s right ? Just wanted to confirm |
|
|
09/22/2006 02:37:01 PM · #362 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: A question about the shutter speed. Since my 30D can do Xsync of 1/250s, I assume I can't have shutter speeds faster than 1/250s right ? Just wanted to confirm |
You are correct.
|
|
|
09/22/2006 02:50:05 PM · #363 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: A question about the shutter speed. Since my 30D can do Xsync of 1/250s, I assume I can't have shutter speeds faster than 1/250s right ? Just wanted to confirm |
With strobes, correct. If you have the Canon 550EX or 580EX flashes, you can set them to high speed mode and then shoot above 1/250th.
|
|
|
09/22/2006 03:40:56 PM · #364 |
Thanks Cindi, David.
So if I want to shoot with a shallow dof ( using may be f2.8, 3.5) I need to just keep turning down my lights and avoid ambient light ? I can possibly keep the modelling lights a full power and reduce the flash power. Very low modelling lights are a pain I have seen |
|
|
09/22/2006 04:01:15 PM · #365 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Thanks Cindi, David.
So if I want to shoot with a shallow dof ( using may be f2.8, 3.5) I need to just keep turning down my lights and avoid ambient light ? I can possibly keep the modelling lights a full power and reduce the flash power. Very low modelling lights are a pain I have seen |
Correct.
And just a tip... After I measure the light, I always take a test shot without the strobes firing to see what the ambient light is looking like. In most cases, I don't want ambient light so I keep my shutter speed up high. But slow it down if I'm in a setting where ambient lighting contributes to the portrait.
By the way, the sync speed on the 5D is only 1/200 which kinda hurts.
If f/2.8 is still letting in too much ambient light at 1/250th (and that's a good amount of light) then maybe switching to a longer lens so you can keep the shallow DOF but with a smaller aperture would work.
|
|
|
09/22/2006 04:03:09 PM · #366 |
I was going to make a joke about how bad these are, but then worried you wouldn't read on to find the compliment. These are not 'traditional' portraits, but they can still be described as portraits and they really are quite wonderful. If you cranked up the technique and lighting much more they would lose the character that makes them so enjoyable.
But, there is plenty of room to stretch yourself and many styles of portraiture to enjoy.
Message edited by author 2006-09-22 16:04:02.
|
|
|
09/24/2006 11:04:14 PM · #367 |
I just bought a new flash unit and currently experimenting with the bounce flash technique.Basically I had 2 lightning source. Natural lightning coming from the window to the right side of her face and my flash that bounced on the wall and come on the left side of her face.
Here's my best shots
I would like to know your opinion concerning the lightning. Feel free to tell me what need to be improved. |
|
|
09/27/2006 03:35:38 AM · #368 |
Hi,
I had an entry in the leading lines challenge, it didn't do too well which I half expected. I'm curious as to people's opinions on the post processing - I was going for high key, did I overdo it? The image looks fine on my computer...
Here are a few more shots from the same shoot
Thanks a lot Cindi your comments have helped me so much with my studio lighting! |
|
|
09/27/2006 08:46:39 AM · #369 |
Leok...I left you a couple of comments on two of your photos. |
|
|
09/27/2006 02:58:54 PM · #370 |
Hi all. I have been reading this thread, and after taking a local workshop using studio strobes, I am planning to purchase a set. I have everything picked out for the most part, but have a quick question.
What is a good versitile size for a soft box? I am looking at the Photoflex soft box to combine with a set of Alien Bees. I was thinking the 24x32 would fit my smallish studio space well and be versitile enough to shoot small groups (family stuff). Any thoughts? |
|
|
09/27/2006 05:13:01 PM · #371 |
Originally posted by albc28: Leok...I left you a couple of comments on two of your photos. |
Thanks very much for your kind comments.
In this image she is actually lying across a tall stool draped in white fabric which was very easy to remove in photoshop.
The original is similar to except that the stool in this second shot is shorter...
|
|
|
09/27/2006 05:15:51 PM · #372 |
Originally posted by chunky: Hi all. I have been reading this thread, and after taking a local workshop using studio strobes, I am planning to purchase a set. I have everything picked out for the most part, but have a quick question.
What is a good versitile size for a soft box? I am looking at the Photoflex soft box to combine with a set of Alien Bees. I was thinking the 24x32 would fit my smallish studio space well and be versitile enough to shoot small groups (family stuff). Any thoughts? |
Good enough. Treat the softbox like a window. Eventually the more you shoot the more you'll gravitate to smaller modifiers for control purposes.
If you really need a lot of coverage for small groups, consider umbrellas. They're cheaper and I like them for sheer area.
|
|
|
09/27/2006 05:16:01 PM · #373 |
Leo - there is some very nice work there. Your high-key setup is working very nicely.
Chunky - a 24X32 softbox should serve you very well for individual or group portraits if you also have another light or two for fill/hair/background.
|
|
|
09/27/2006 05:57:56 PM · #374 |
Originally posted by idnic: Leo - there is some very nice work there. Your high-key setup is working very nicely.
Chunky - a 24X32 softbox should serve you very well for individual or group portraits if you also have another light or two for fill/hair/background. |
Cool - praise from Cindi ;-) A couple of things you have said in this thread have taken my lighting to the next level and I really appreciate you taking the time to help us. |
|
|
09/27/2006 06:13:47 PM · #375 |
Originally posted by Leok: Cool - praise from Cindi ;-) A couple of things you have said in this thread have taken my lighting to the next level and I really appreciate you taking the time to help us. |
Aweee, I don't know much, Leo, but I'm happy to share what I've learned. Someone was nice enough to do it for me. Your work is getting very good, glad to see you're still working hard - that's when the changes come. :)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 10:58:55 AM EDT.