| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/29/2007 11:59:59 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:07:48 AM · #2 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:12:53 AM · #3 |
I truly do not have high hopes on my submission.
I think I over did it a bit.
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:13:36 AM · #4 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:14:25 AM · #5 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:14:39 AM · #6 |
Votes: 1
Views: 3
Avg Vote: 6.0000
WOOOO! |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:16:23 AM · #7 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:16:27 AM · #8 |
| Sorry, I have to change the thread title slightly : ) |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:29:34 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Sorry, I have to change the thread title slightly : ) |
Must be nice to have the power to do such things when you feel like it. :-)
MattO
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:31:26 AM · #10 |
A less than auspicious start, but I am unworried:
otes: 3
Views: 5
Avg Vote: 5.3333
Comments: 0 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:31:33 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by MattO:
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Sorry, I have to change the thread title slightly : ) |
Must be nice to have the power to do such things when you feel like it. :-)
MattO |
At times the responsibility is oppressive : ( |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:32:55 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by MattO:
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Sorry, I have to change the thread title slightly : ) |
Must be nice to have the power to do such things when you feel like it. :-)
MattO |
At times the responsibility is oppressive : ( |
Or abused
MattO
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:35:34 AM · #13 |
| Since when is science "factual"? Science merely disproves facts...it doesn't establish them. Perhaps GeneralE is thinking of science as being the opposite of Science Fictions...therefor Science Fact? Hmmm... |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:45:11 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by KaDi:
Since when is science "factual"? Science merely disproves facts...it doesn't establish them. Perhaps GeneralE is thinking of science as being the opposite of Science Fictions...therefor Science Fact? Hmmm... |
while it disproves facts it also proves facts.
like say a Noble Gas will always have 0 valence electrons, making it always have a full orbital of electrons. Thats a fact found by science |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:45:25 AM · #15 |
45 minutes of nada. I'm going to bed.
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:48:08 AM · #16 |
Votes: 3
Views: 7
Avg Vote: 6.0000 |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 12:52:48 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by noisemaker:
Originally posted by KaDi:
Since when is science "factual"? Science merely disproves facts...it doesn't establish them. Perhaps GeneralE is thinking of science as being the opposite of Science Fictions...therefor Science Fact? Hmmm... |
while it disproves facts it also proves facts.
like say a Noble Gas will always have 0 valence electrons, making it always have a full orbital of electrons. Thats a fact found by science |
Uh, no. When you create the definitions, then call them "facts" then prove that things fit those created "facts"....you have not proven anything. For example, what's an "electron"? (...and how do you know?) |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 01:23:29 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by KaDi:
Originally posted by noisemaker:
Originally posted by KaDi:
Since when is science "factual"? Science merely disproves facts...it doesn't establish them. Perhaps GeneralE is thinking of science as being the opposite of Science Fictions...therefor Science Fact? Hmmm... |
while it disproves facts it also proves facts.
like say a Noble Gas will always have 0 valence electrons, making it always have a full orbital of electrons. Thats a fact found by science |
Uh, no. When you create the definitions, then call them "facts" then prove that things fit those created "facts"....you have not proven anything. For example, what's an "electron"? (...and how do you know?) |
yeah but when you disprove a fact, your just creating another fact. |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 01:26:27 AM · #19 |
Votes: 8
Views: 14
Avg Vote: 6.2500
Comments: 0
i like... I LIKE! |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 01:32:02 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by noisemaker:
yeah but when you disprove a fact, your just creating another fact. |
cute. but, no.
oh and:
Votes: 9
Views: 12
which, i surmise, could mean that only 1 out of 4 viewers wish to consider my image a bit further before casting an arbitrary rating upon it :) |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 01:38:13 AM · #21 |
I believe science to be proving nothing, no facts, no theories, no set in stone documents or rules. Rather science is just explaining what we do not know. What we want to know. Science is questions. Questions get answered but there are always more questions to explain. Answers can change, questions can change. Nothing is fact nor fiction, just explanations of relative observations.
Which leads me to the ultimate answer to the universe...............
................................42.
Oh almost forgot:
Votes: 6
Views: 17
Avg Vote: 4.3333
Originally posted by noisemaker:
Originally posted by KaDi:
Since when is science "factual"? Science merely disproves facts...it doesn't establish them. Perhaps GeneralE is thinking of science as being the opposite of Science Fictions...therefor Science Fact? Hmmm... |
while it disproves facts it also proves facts.
like say a Noble Gas will always have 0 valence electrons, making it always have a full orbital of electrons. Thats a fact found by science |
Message edited by author 2007-05-30 01:39:02. |
|
|
|
05/30/2007 01:47:04 AM · #22 |
Votes: 9
Views: 16
Avg Vote: 6.1111
Comments: 0
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 01:49:58 AM · #23 |
Truly the fact
Votes: 10
Views: 13
Avg Vote: 5.4000
Comments: 0
so..does it looks good for playing against RibbonHogs?
I guess not..I'm going to join the New bar thread...need to order
a cup of coffee or milk *lol*
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 02:01:03 AM · #24 |
Votes: 8
Views: 10
Avg Vote: 5.2500
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
I think that with the broad array of views on science and the different approaches I think everyone is considering everyone else's image to be DNMC.
Of course thats a broad generalization with no basis in fact whatsover and is merely my own opinion based on the 8 votes I have received and the handful of scores that have been presented. Should I obtain a large sample, I will be able to test my hypothesis and thereby come to some sort of conclusion through empirical evidence.
I make me laugh :)
|
|
|
|
05/30/2007 02:12:16 AM · #25 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2025 07:50:48 PM EDT.
