| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/07/2011 12:29:58 PM · #1 |
Post 'em if you got 'em!
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 12:34:55 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 12:55:06 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 01:01:41 PM · #4 |
 Yes, I have one. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 01:03:39 PM · #5 |
Screwed up the date on my camera, this was my only 7+ image |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 01:12:09 PM · #6 |
Figured I was safe opening the file in Elements and doing a Save As. Nope. Since elements saved things in stacks, it modified the original, even though I did a Save As.
It was at 6.7 when it was DQ'd
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 01:31:26 PM · #7 |
| 317 challenges, no DQs. I did acouple of self-DQs though, but those don't show. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 02:10:26 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by scarbrd:
317 challenges, no DQs. I did acouple of self-DQs though, but those don't show. |
Wow! You follow the rules! |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 02:36:57 PM · #9 |
No DQs yet *knock on wood*
I have only ever been asked for validating twice though. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 02:56:54 PM · #10 |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 04:07:58 PM · #11 |
| 294 challenges and no DQ's........not even self-DQ's. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 04:24:38 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by KarenNfld:
294 challenges and no DQ's........not even self-DQ's. |
show off! :P
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 04:33:03 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
Originally posted by KarenNfld:
294 challenges and no DQ's........not even self-DQ's. |
show off! :P |
What she said. |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 05:00:24 PM · #14 |
My 2nd entry, from way back before I learned to read. It's gotten a lot of views though.
I had in mind what it would be like to shoot a wedding and find later that you had a couple of huge dust bunnies on the sensor when you brought the images up on the screen. I'm sure that it's a nightmare that some of us have had.
|
|
|
|
01/07/2011 05:24:34 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
Originally posted by KarenNfld:
294 challenges and no DQ's........not even self-DQ's. |
show off! :P |
How about 586 without a DQ (couple of self-DQ's) - is that decent? :-) |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 05:50:19 PM · #16 |
From before any borders were allowed:  Disputed interpretation of the "Artwork Rule":   |
|
|
|
01/07/2011 11:55:46 PM · #17 |
Guess I've never pushed hard enough.
All my DQ's below:
|
|
|
|
01/08/2011 12:07:36 PM · #18 |
Were you able to reverse any of them? |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 12:17:28 PM · #19 |
From not keeping my original which actually thought I would never need once I realised it...
To a stupid stupid mistake which I so regret as I really loved this shot and wanted it on my front page
May there never be another |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 12:23:12 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by RianBotes:
May there never be another |
Amen!! |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 12:58:27 PM · #21 |
This was my only DQ. The original didn't look that much different, so I was sort of disgusted with the verdict. However, the image was not all that, so ultimately it didn't matter to me.
I think I've done 3 self DQs over time. |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 01:04:29 PM · #22 |
My first entry...I don't even think I read the rules. Look at the description. I pretty much telegraphed that it didn't obey the rules. The DQ was for no original sent in. I don't even remember the email request !
(Oh...I"m on the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, my daughter is driving and I'm on my new mac tethered to my Droid.) |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 01:30:02 PM · #23 |
| Ain't technology grand? Would you PM me with how you did that? Both me and my sweetie want to use our phones to connect our laptops to the internet. |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 02:56:11 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by tanguera:
Were you able to reverse any of them? |
No ... but I argued so much about the first one that they decided to punish me by asking me to join the Site Council.
The first one is a clear violation of an objective but "stupid" rule which we later got rid of. The two others are sujective decisions I still disagree with -- obviously I wouldn't submit something I though violated the rule as I understood it.
FWIW I do not look at the SC discussion thread when I have an image subject to validation -- all my communications are via PM, just like everyone else.
Message edited by author 2011-01-08 14:58:24. |
|
|
|
01/08/2011 03:54:33 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
No ... but I argued so much about the first one that they decided to punish me by asking me to join the Site Council. |
If arguing is what gets you on SC, how come I'm not on it? LOL
R. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/10/2025 03:32:06 PM EDT.
