| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/10/2013 02:00:12 PM · #76 |
Originally posted by alexr909:
my bad... I can remove the article if you would like. I never claimed to be the photographer or owner of any of these images. |
That will be a very good idea, thanks. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:02:42 PM · #77 |
now... what to do about the rest of our images... ?
|
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:06:15 PM · #78 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
now... what to do about the rest of our images... ? |
It will be one empty blog, that's for sure. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:13:07 PM · #79 |
| I googled a few of the sentences for the unattributed text entries and they also appear to be copied from other places. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:20:02 PM · #80 |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:29:14 PM · #81 |
1 of mine and a few other dp challenge memebers here caution not work safe
//e-hotsex.com/candid/candid-portraits-voting-dpchallenge.html
|
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:45:58 PM · #82 |
Originally posted by bergiekat:
Originally posted by MNet:
Originally posted by bergiekat:
Guess I'm dumb...are you dragging thumbnails or are you going to the full sized photo page...thumbnails get me my submission page for that photo. (Maybe this is correct.) |
I have the same problem. I am using Firefox. |
I'm using Internet Explorer. |
Not working for me either and I'm using IE too. Maybe it's a Chrome-only capability. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:47:14 PM · #83 |
Seems someone figured out and mentioned it works in Chrome only...guess we need TinEye...althought somewhat limited.
|
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:48:40 PM · #84 |
May I suggest making your warning more prominent? For example:
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
You know, just an example.
Message edited by author 2013-01-10 14:49:42. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:53:34 PM · #85 |
Originally posted by yanko:
May I suggest making your warning more prominent? For example:
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
You know, just an example. |
ROFL. Why? Because you think people shouldn't have to be bothered to actually read and comprehend things?
FWIW, they'd probably TL;DR your post because it was too long. ;)
Message edited by author 2013-01-10 14:54:16. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:53:41 PM · #86 |
Originally posted by yanko:
May I suggest making your warning more prominent? For example:
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
You know, just an example. |
The e-hotsex in the URL wasn't obvious enough? |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:54:38 PM · #87 |
Originally posted by Venser:
Originally posted by yanko:
May I suggest making your warning more prominent? For example:
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
You know, just an example. |
The e-hotsex in the URL wasn't obvious enough? |
Apparently not. :/ |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:56:52 PM · #88 |
Originally posted by bergiekat:
Seems someone figured out and mentioned it works in Chrome only...guess we need TinEye...althought somewhat limited. |
nope it works in firefox. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:57:03 PM · #89 |
Originally posted by bergiekat:
Seems someone figured out and mentioned it works in Chrome only...guess we need TinEye...althought somewhat limited. |
Works for me in Firefox. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 02:58:12 PM · #90 |
Originally posted by yanko:
Originally posted by Venser:
Originally posted by yanko:
May I suggest making your warning more prominent? For example:
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE FOR WORK********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF CHILDREN ARE AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
*******NOT SAFE IF ANOTHER HUMAN IS AROUND ********
You know, just an example. |
The e-hotsex in the URL wasn't obvious enough? |
Apparently not. :/ |
now im dying to click on it but I'm at work... where is my phone?
edit: doesn't work on the phone, keeps jumping me ahead to the ad page, backing up wont get me back.
Message edited by author 2013-01-10 15:00:32. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 03:15:52 PM · #91 |
| i did say it wasnt work safe, not my fault if you didnt read it |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 03:19:57 PM · #92 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
Originally posted by bergiekat:
Seems someone figured out and mentioned it works in Chrome only...guess we need TinEye...althought somewhat limited. |
Works for me in Firefox. |
...you, too Mike!
Nix on both of you, lol, I can't get it to work no matter...if you click on the camera image, you can drop the photo in and search, but I can never get anything beyond DPC, regardless. :) |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 03:30:11 PM · #93 |
| are you dragging the thumbnail or the gif protection? does it return similar images that look like yours color wise? |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 03:34:16 PM · #94 |
| no...it just shows the same photo on a white page or it shows the submission page |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 03:48:53 PM · #95 |
Yep... that one's mine, too.
|
|
|
|
01/10/2013 03:54:33 PM · #96 |
Originally posted by Giles_uk:
i did say it wasnt work safe, not my fault if you didnt read it |
You're right. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 04:47:53 PM · #97 |
More here
Solved the IE issue. If you download the image to your desktop, you then click on the camera image on google.com [images] and you can select the upload image option, and browse for your photo. Quite longwinded, but it works.
Message edited by author 2013-01-10 16:48:07. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 04:52:13 PM · #98 |
Originally posted by mikeee:
More here
Solved the IE issue. If you download the image to your desktop, you then click on the camera image on google.com [images] and you can select the upload image option, and browse for your photo. Quite longwinded, but it works. |
holy CRAP when i did this i found 474 hits for my image and a browse of the first few pages looks like a lot of them are unique. crap! |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 05:04:09 PM · #99 |
| At the very least, most of these sites credit the photographer. That LBN blog does not. |
|
|
|
01/10/2013 05:18:25 PM · #100 |
Not sure if this one of Scott's  scooter88 has been mentioned here... but LBN gives credit to:
"I, LBN: Tami Holbrook, an LBN E-Lert reader from Pearl City, Hawaii."
Scooter88's photo
And here's another one of mine: Apparently, the images on his site turn people on
Message edited by author 2013-01-10 18:15:25. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/10/2025 06:21:46 PM EDT.
