| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/12/2014 01:05:28 AM · #1 |
It is finally time to bump pixel limits and file size limits.
Current sizes are a crime against nature.
 |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 01:13:20 AM · #2 |
| Five bucks says someone will complain about it when it happens!! |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 01:24:11 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by Enlightened:
Five bucks says someone will complain about it when it happens!! |
Absolutely :) |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 02:33:52 AM · #4 |
| We will survive to the ones who are going to complain - let's have it (better 1200px). |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 02:51:12 AM · #5 |
It's been EIGHT YEARS since prop 800. It is time for prop 1200.
I'd also propose an amendment: "Whiners will be restricted to 80 pixels" |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 03:46:55 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
It's been EIGHT YEARS since prop 800. It is time for prop 1200.
I'd also propose an amendment: "Whiners will be restricted to 80 pixels" |
800 only since Nov 2009...
Size n Dim Limit Increase announcement. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:13:49 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
It's been EIGHT YEARS since prop 800. It is time for prop 1200.
I'd also propose an amendment: "Whiners will be restricted to 80 pixels" |
+1, go for 1200! |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:21:01 AM · #8 |
| Let's make it large enough so that most people have to scroll horizontal as well as vertical. I don't intentionally vote down when I have to scroll, but I don't get the full impact of the photo. I know I am in the minority... |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:21:10 AM · #9 |
| But what about the poor souls on laptops....which is the oft-repeated response in opposition of the change. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:21:36 AM · #10 |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:22:34 AM · #11 |
| Sorry Garry I was refering to Elaine but you got in the way. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:36:10 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Garry:
But what about the poor souls on laptops....which is the oft-repeated response in opposition of the change. |
I'm a poor soul on a laptop and I'm screaming, "Yes, pleeeeaaaase - give me 1200px!!!" Can't tell you how many images I've abandoned because a decent edit didn't translate at that size. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:38:36 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by Elaine:
Let's make it large enough so that most people have to scroll horizontal as well as vertical. I don't intentionally vote down when I have to scroll, but I don't get the full impact of the photo. I know I am in the minority... |
The thing is, if it's too big you can just hold the control button down and turn the mouse wheel to make it smaller, or use Command-minus/plus to change the zoom on a Mac. It's not a difficult thing to adjust. I do it all the time when shots are too long vertically. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:39:38 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by backdoorhippie:
Originally posted by Garry:
But what about the poor souls on laptops....which is the oft-repeated response in opposition of the change. |
I'm a poor soul on a laptop and I'm screaming, "Yes, pleeeeaaaase - give me 1200px!!!" Can't tell
you how many images I've abandoned because a decent edit didn't translate at that size. |
Oh. I agree completely. Can't understand why we're still living in backwater times with 800px. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 10:56:41 AM · #15 |
1200px will demand better photography from everyone, and not so easily hide mountains of PP.
I'm all for it. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 11:02:00 AM · #16 |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 11:05:07 AM · #17 |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 11:08:50 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by bohemka:
FREE THE PIXELS |
Indeed! But can we incarcerate HDR in return?
Give and take and all that. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 11:12:08 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by Garry:
Originally posted by bohemka:
FREE THE PIXELS |
Indeed! But can we incarcerate HDR in return?
Give and take and all that. |
DPC does not and will not participate in prisoner swaps. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 11:18:04 AM · #20 |
| No but we will open the borders for all without question |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 12:37:32 PM · #21 |
| Would we settle for implementation of Proposition 1000? |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 12:46:14 PM · #22 |
| could easily do what 500px does, where it automatically resizes depending on the size of your screen. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 01:02:08 PM · #23 |
| I agree, have the software resize for the size of your viewing device. With todays lenses and sensors, we lose so much information reducing to 800 pixels. Its a real shame. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 01:06:03 PM · #24 |
That would requite recoding...which until recently was unlikely to happen.
Recent changes to DPC make me hopeful...kind of. |
|
|
|
10/12/2014 01:08:04 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by LanndonKane:
could easily do what 500px does, where it automatically resizes depending on the size of your screen. |
That's a responsive layout and not sure the current framework of dpc could handle it. I'm sure landon is secretly working in his lair working on a completely new site for us... Just wait and see :) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/10/2025 04:18:01 PM EDT.
