| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/20/2004 02:48:56 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by brownt:
If you e-mail the full size ones to me, I can put them up on my //www.brownt.co.uk site?? |
Thought you might like to know - went to your site and every image comes up as 'image stolen from //www.brownt.co.uk'
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:05:44 PM · #27 |
| You guys are trying to make me upgrade to the 20d aren't you? |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:12:37 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
Originally posted by brownt:
If you e-mail the full size ones to me, I can put them up on my //www.brownt.co.uk site?? |
Thought you might like to know - went to your site and every image comes up as 'image stolen from //www.brownt.co.uk |
Site looks fine to me... Is anyone else having problems??
Use this link, //www.brownt.co.uk |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:17:02 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by brownt:
Originally posted by Gordon:
Originally posted by brownt:
If you e-mail the full size ones to me, I can put them up on my //www.brownt.co.uk site?? |
Thought you might like to know - went to your site and every image comes up as 'image stolen from //www.brownt.co.uk |
Site looks fine to me... Is anyone else having problems??
Use this link, //www.brownt.co.uk |
Just getting the "Stolen" message Terry instead of the displayed image.
Meant to mention that to you the last time I visited..but thought it might be something wrong with my setup.
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:19:20 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by geewhy:
Originally posted by brownt:
Originally posted by Gordon:
Originally posted by brownt:
If you e-mail the full size ones to me, I can put them up on my //www.brownt.co.uk site?? |
Thought you might like to know - went to your site and every image comes up as 'image stolen from //www.brownt.co.uk |
Site looks fine to me... Is anyone else having problems??
Use this link, //www.brownt.co.uk |
Just getting the "Stolen" message Terry instead of the displayed image.
Meant to mention that to you the last time I visited..but thought it might be something wrong with my setup. |
Which links is it that you are clicking on? |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:21:43 PM · #31 |
I looked at a couple of images and everything seems fine.
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:23:01 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
I looked at a couple of images and everything seems fine. |
Thanks
Can't seem to get any error messages up.
It's setup so that if you link to an images path name you will get the stolen message i.e. //www.brownt.co.uk/images/t.jpg |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:29:34 PM · #33 |
okay, so judging by the photos there's obvious a light source so it wasn't completely dark or anything. Maybe it's a matter of there being enough light that the sensor didn't have to compensate hugely, therefore, not tons of noise.
Just a thought.
I shot photos with my 10D last week at ISO800. When the sun hit just right there was wayyyyy less noise, but when it went behind a cloud the noise was terrible.
Message edited by author 2004-10-20 15:30:22. |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:32:28 PM · #34 |
I've shot with the 10D at ISO 1600 with little or no noise. It all depends on the subject.
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004 03:55:01 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
I've shot with the 10D at ISO 1600 with little or no noise. It all depends on the subject. |
Hope nobody thinks I`m trying to imply that the 20D beats all the competition here.
I have absolutely no experience with DSLRs and am experimenting to find out what works and what doesn`t, I`ve posted here for an evaluation from people who can compare.
My own view is that it produces much better images than I was prepared for at such a high ISO setting and under conditions (floodlighting)where I expected a to see a lot of noise.
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004 04:10:40 PM · #36 |
Originally posted by GoldBerry:
okay, so judging by the photos there's obvious a light source so it wasn't completely dark or anything. Maybe it's a matter of there being enough light that the sensor didn't have to compensate hugely, therefore, not tons of noise.
Just a thought.
I shot photos with my 10D last week at ISO800. When the sun hit just right there was wayyyyy less noise, but when it went behind a cloud the noise was terrible. |
That's because noise is mostly dependent on shutter speed - less light, longer shutter speed, for the same exposure... |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 04:33:04 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by geewhy:
Originally posted by cpanaioti:
I've shot with the 10D at ISO 1600 with little or no noise. It all depends on the subject. |
Hope nobody thinks I`m trying to imply that the 20D beats all the competition here.
I have absolutely no experience with DSLRs and am experimenting to find out what works and what doesn`t, I`ve posted here for an evaluation from people who can compare.
My own view is that it produces much better images than I was prepared for at such a high ISO setting and under conditions (floodlighting)where I expected a to see a lot of noise. |
This was no indication that you were. I was just making a statement based on experience with my camera.
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004 06:04:17 PM · #38 |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 06:07:13 PM · #39 |
|
|
|
10/20/2004 08:03:59 PM · #40 |
looks sweet, cant wait till i get my 20d....i gotta wait though till theyre not so backordered (ahh the hassles of getting an employee discount)
|
|
|
|
10/21/2004 03:29:13 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by Bobster:
 |
:-) Was just looking through the logs of the site, wondered why someone was linking to a picture on the site... At least the hotlinking stuff works! |
|
|
|
10/21/2004 03:57:51 PM · #42 |
| Your shots look great to me. I see some minor noise in the full sized crops but not as much as some cameras I've used at their lowest setting. But, at the risk of sounding picky, I could make better judgements on the 20D's noise level, if I knew aperture and shutter speed as well as ISO. But I'd venture to say that Canon's claims for the reduced noise levels will hold up and that the 20D sets a new standard in it's price range. Thanks for sharing. |
|
|
|
10/22/2004 12:18:52 PM · #43 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
Your shots look great to me. I see some minor noise in the full sized crops but not as much as some cameras I've used at their lowest setting. But, at the risk of sounding picky, I could make better judgements on the 20D's noise level, if I knew aperture and shutter speed as well as ISO. But I'd venture to say that Canon's claims for the reduced noise levels will hold up and that the 20D sets a new standard in it's price range. Thanks for sharing. |
The info you requested Harvey is...
Shutter speed...1/320
Aperture...F4.5
|
|
|
|
10/22/2004 03:11:21 PM · #44 |
| Thanks. Apparently the ability to shoot at such high ISO without concern for excessive noise is going to yield lots more options in selecting subjects and lighting situations. |
|
|
|
10/22/2004 03:18:03 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
Thanks. Apparently the ability to shoot at such high ISO without concern for excessive noise is going to yield lots more options in selecting subjects and lighting situations. |
Yes...between that and the IS on my 17-85mm lens, a whole new world of opportunity has opened up for me..now if I can just get smart enough to take advantage of that..I`m in business !
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 07:44:08 PM EDT.
