Originally posted by Britannica:
Originally posted by Steve2000:
Sorry, i seem to have hijacked this thread. I'll leave you morally bankrupt heathens to wallow in your own filth.
If you are honest with yourself you'll know i'm right. |
You'll be back ... and you'll hate yourself for it. ;P
If you are honest with yourself you'll know i'm right. ;)
---
The pose is great. But if you'll bear with a comment from someone looking at a monitor that can not be calibrated -- the shadow under the arm is (as was mentioned) is dark enough to be distracting, and I am not seeing any sort of seperation between the skirt (blanket, sheet?) and the background or between the dark shadows on her lower back and the background -- I think it would look better if the seperation was present. Also, I don't see the 'painted look' you mentioned -- it just looks over NeatImaged to me. As I said, this monitor is not capable of being calibrated, so if the above is not accurate just ignore it.
Thank you for showing your respect for her 'filthy' curves, and for allowing use to show our respect as well. ;)
David |
the original is much brighter so the detail which you mentioned is visible. On the other hand, this is the effect I was trying to get. Thanks for looking and commenting because you are about 60% correct. I wanted the eyes on her, not the sheet covering her, or the background around her etc. :)
Joe
|
