I just downloaded a program called Pixelnhance There sharpen program look like
|
|
10/23/2002 04:57:06 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by m_square: I just downloaded a program called Pixelnhance
can I use all the features? Will I be breaking the rules because of the noise adjustment.
It's probably legal; different terminology for the same technology.
I'd suggest you take a small sample image and run a bunch of variations; use extremes of the settings so you can easily see what's going on. If you can post or email the samples it will be easier to tell if there's a problem...or maybe someone else is already familiar with this... |
|
|
10/23/2002 05:02:23 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Patella: I was actually a little curious about the suggestion to sharpen at 100%.
If you view at any other magnification you screen is re-sampling and anti-aliasing the image for display, so you can't really tell how much effect the filter is having. It's easy to over-sharpen if your display shows the final "print" size. At 100% you see the actual color changes pixel-by-pixel. Of course, when I'm all done, I zoom out to the final size as well...
I just remembered...I have a gallery of examples of Unsharp Mask effects at pBase.
* This message has been edited by the author on 10/23/2002 5:04:54 PM. |
|
|
10/23/2002 05:30:19 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Patella: I was actually a little curious about the suggestion to sharpen at 100% -- I thoroughly agree in terms of sharpening for the web, but I'm not so certain when it comes to sharpening for prints. Perhaps I'm slightly misinterpreting what he means.
Doesn't it make more sense to view your image at print size when sharpening for prints? (EG at 24% for a 300 dpi image.) In a manner of speaking, that is 100%, so maybe that's where I'm getting confused.
Well, the thing is, if you don't sharpen at 100% you don't actually see the effect of sharpening.
See, resampling is the biggest cause of 'softer' images, and when you are looking at a zoomed version of your image, you are looking at a very quick and nastily resampled version of the underlying image.
so if you sharpen the zoomed version (either in or out from 100%) you'll see aliasing over the top of the sharpening you've done - so it could well look softer than it 'actually' is.
The resampling thing is also the reason why you should sharpen _after_ you've sized your image. Resizing tends to smooth/ blur edges and this is what you want to fix by sharpening. Sharpening then resizing will either reduce the sharpness you've achieved and/or spread the noise and haloing caused by sharpening further.
I can spend a whole lot more time talking about aliasing and sampling effects and the problems of interpolation on edges if you like, but I don't feel like writing a maths paper today. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 07:45:53 PM EDT.