What give SC the right... - DPChallenge Forums

Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC for Nikon

08/24/2005 01:49:48 PM · #201

Shooting for the 200th post. So close, 201. Maybe I can be post #700.

Message edited by author 2005-08-24 13:52:13.

GeneralE

Canon PowerShot S3 IS

Canon 12x IS USM (S3 IS built-in Lens) -- 36-432mm (35mm EQ)

08/24/2005 01:51:58 PM · #202

Originally posted by Jason:

It's in the damn General section! I must read it!

It's my obligation to read it under the ToA agreement that I agreed to when I became a paying member.

I assume this is hyperbole. I'm also sure the "Ignore" option is available to you.

Canon EOS-20D

08/24/2005 01:52:35 PM · #203

Perhaps we should just leave it this way...

What gives us the right? The site administrators and their rules.

You don't think we should edit or delete posts? Duly noted, as it was the first time you made a thread like this.

I think that's about all the resolution we're going to get here.

Kamlan 28mm F1.4 MF for APS-C

08/24/2005 01:54:56 PM · #204

Originally posted by Manic:

Originally posted by notonline:

Originally posted by Manic:

Originally posted by notonline:
BUT, as they have removed my post they should have also removed he other post which I took offence too.

Your initial post was offtopic, whereas the original as on topic. This was the primary reason for its removal, and has no relation to whether any post was deemed offensive or not.

Sure it does. He quoted a religious quote and I asked " where is your GOD now???" I didn't bring religion into it. I merely asked a question which was removed by SC. Editing the public voice as usual IMO.

The thread wasn't a religious discussion, whereas your question was starting one, hence it was offtopic, hence removed.

Your double talking. I didn't start this thread on religion I started it to say that YOU'S as sitecouncil have no business edtinging a post where it didn't need to be edited. If you delete ONE then you should delete ALL in regards to the subject. By deleting mine your showing favoritism to christians which is against 4.2

Manic

DJI Mini 3 Pro

08/24/2005 01:55:11 PM · #205

Just a reminder to keep posts ontopic. Religious discussion should take place in the Rant forums...

wewillexplore

Canon EOS-1D Mark II

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

08/24/2005 01:55:14 PM · #206

wow, my post lasted 10 whole seconds.

risu81

Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC for Nikon

08/24/2005 01:55:31 PM · #207

Originally posted by mk:

I second this motion and suggest we have a tasty beverage.

nomad469

Nikon D700

Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

08/24/2005 01:56:04 PM · #208

[Stuff removed ... My post should go to rant --- sorry]
I think a tasty beverage is indeed called for

Message edited by author 2005-08-24 13:58:23.

Manic

DJI Mini 3 Pro

Kamlan 28mm F1.4 MF for APS-C

08/24/2005 01:56:47 PM · #209

Originally posted by notonline:

Originally posted by Manic:

Originally posted by notonline:

Originally posted by Manic:

Originally posted by notonline:
BUT, as they have removed my post they should have also removed he other post which I took offence too.

Your initial post was offtopic, whereas the original as on topic. This was the primary reason for its removal, and has no relation to whether any post was deemed offensive or not.

Sure it does. He quoted a religious quote and I asked " where is your GOD now???" I didn't bring religion into it. I merely asked a question which was removed by SC. Editing the public voice as usual IMO.

The thread wasn't a religious discussion, whereas your question was starting one, hence it was offtopic, hence removed.

Your double talking. I didn't start this thread on religion I started it to say that YOU'S as sitecouncil have no business edtinging a post where it didn't need to be edited. If you delete ONE then you should delete ALL in regards to the subject. By deleting mine your showing favoritism to christians which is against 4.2

I'm not showing any favouritism, I'm merely hiding posts that are offtopic. The thread was not discussing religion, therefore your posts were offtopic.

wewillexplore

Canon EOS-1D Mark II

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

08/24/2005 01:58:01 PM · #210

Originally posted by Manic:

Just a reminder to keep posts ontopic. Religious discussion should take place in the Rant forums...

Mine wasn't religious discussion, it was a discussion about NotOnline being offended at religious material. If it was deleted cuz I quoted his post, couldn't you edit out the quote? :)

Look notonline, I've been censored trying to reply to you. lol

M

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

08/24/2005 01:58:35 PM · #211

Originally posted by mk:

do you even understand what I was asking for??? and why??? I wouldn't have had to post a second thread if the first one wasn't hidden plz remember that. It was not out of malicious intent or disrespect of taterbug but merely things had come to a boil and are now left in drew and langdon's hands.

rex

Canon PowerShot SD780

08/24/2005 01:59:08 PM · #212

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II

08/24/2005 02:00:41 PM · #213

I got into the office this morning and found this thread. I read. ...and I read. .....and read some more. Then I hit refresh and found that I now had a lot more reading to do, so I read. ...and read. Hit refresh again and read faster and faster. Read, read, read, refresh, read, refresh, read. Holy crap! I'll never keep up! So I will just leave my contribution and walk away...

Canon EOS-20D

08/24/2005 02:02:03 PM · #214

Originally posted by notonline:

do you even understand what I was asking for??? and why???

I understand what you are asking for. I'm acknowledging that I have heard your request/opinion.

LeeD

Canon EOS-30D

08/24/2005 02:03:45 PM · #215

Originally posted by rex:

Uh-oh.... we've reached double raking status!!!

Originally posted by kpriest:

It won't work... I've been flashing my boobies and the madness won't stop!!!

08/24/2005 02:08:37 PM · #216

Originally posted by mk:

Originally posted by notonline:

do you even understand what I was asking for??? and why???

I understand what you are asking for. I'm acknowledging that I have heard your request/opinion.

and this concludes our broadcast day

Message edited by author 2005-08-24 14:09:22.

risu81

Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC for Nikon

08/24/2005 02:08:40 PM · #217

Where's my post on keeping communication during work hours focused on work? There were no religious references in it. Why was it deleted?........ OH my bad, it's on page one of this thread. Sorry! ;)

strangeghost

Canon EOS-7D

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

08/24/2005 02:13:09 PM · #218

Thanks to Muckpond for posting the comments that were hidden so we can all see what the excitement is about.

Thanks to the SC for volunteering their time to run The Greatest Site On The Internet so that we "no-lifes" can have a place to hang out.

Thanks to D&L for creating TGSOTI.

Thanks to my parents for all the support and inspiration.

Thanks to Mrs. Stevens, my high school typing teacher for teaching the most useful class I ever had in High School.

Art Roflmao

Canon EOS-6D Mark II

08/24/2005 02:14:36 PM · #219

Originally posted by ldowse:

It won't work... I've been flashing my boobies and the madness won't stop!!!

Even flaming radioactive breath has no effect.

milo655321

Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4.0 AT-X Pro DX

08/24/2005 02:14:40 PM · #220

Originally posted by Manic:

The thread wasn't a religious discussion, whereas your question was starting one, hence it was offtopic, hence removed.

Back from lunch ...

Based on what I've read, I think that statement sums up the decision of the SC the best. notonline, your comments were inflammatory and not pertinent to the OP. You were the one attempting to start what appears to be a religious debate in a thread wherein the topic of the thread wasn't specifically addressing religion.

ETA: Darn, I knew I would miss all the fun.

Message edited by author 2005-08-24 14:15:50.

mycelium

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

08/24/2005 02:15:32 PM · #221

this thread is retarded....

//www.couronne.net/images/june27/rio25.jpg
//www.owned.com/Owned_Pictures/retardmatrixowned.jpg

Message edited by Manic - please post thumbs or links, not large images.

kiropractic

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

08/24/2005 02:20:59 PM · #222

you know, my neice is not even 2 years old yet and she doesn't cry and fuss and whine as much as a VERY select few people do this site. big deal if something was removed or edited....life goes on....its ONLY A WEBSITE and its only a FORUM!!!
i found my neice's pacifier she left at my house, if you would like "notonline" ill send it to you, free of charge just stop fussing and bickering...geez you even have a website about things you hate. it seems you have alot of hate inside too. i know you dont mean any harm, but c'mon, just chill have a drink or something and go out and take more cool photographs.

08/24/2005 02:26:24 PM · #223

Originally posted by kiropractic:

Please send all pacifers to:
1001 Queen St. West
Toronto, Ontario
Canada

Its not the point of bickering but the point of being heard regardless of the topic and regardless of my post which was finally done here after 9 pages. move over chit rabbington LOL but seriously and I think everybody should be onboard with this. If you have something to say then you should say it without consiquence or editing. Now that Sc understands (finally) this thread can drift off into the rake as seen above. You know... there's never a forum killer around when you need one.

rex

Canon PowerShot SD780

08/24/2005 02:26:39 PM · #224

Originally posted by mycelium:

this thread is retarded....

//www.couronne.net/images/june27/rio25.jpg
//www.owned.com/Owned_Pictures/retardmatrixowned.jpg

Looks like you were owned on the hotlink.