| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/06/2005 06:24:30 PM · #1 |
Hi again dear DPC's.
I've got a plan to buy a new lens. My wife is near convinced...
I I get short on the money I'm planning in the sigma 10-20mm for landscapes/nature.
If I can afford I'll go for the 70-200 f2.8 from Sigma.
Can you care to comment about this lens? About the 10-20 I've readed good and bad things, like soft focus or vigneting. Regarding the 70-200 Would it be a better money for glass than the Nikon 80-200f2.8, wich is more expensive.
Your comments and personal experience are wellcome.
|
|
|
|
10/06/2005 06:37:36 PM · #2 |
i ordered a sigma 10-20 and it is currently in the mail. I should get it sometime this week or early next week. I will try to write some of my impressions of it. For me it was either the sigma 10-20 or the tokina 12-24. I choose the sigma bcos it was smaller, lighter, has good optics according to the reviews i've seen (though the tokina is a very sharp lens as well), and for the little extra wideness it was over the tokina.
|
|
|
|
10/06/2005 06:41:43 PM · #3 |
Also discussed here
Nordic |
|
|
|
10/06/2005 08:04:44 PM · #4 |
I have no experience with the 10-20 and only a week so with the 70-200. But I can say that it is very sharp, focuses fast and has superior build quality. And it's a fairly heavy lens. Here's the first image I have posted from the 70-200.
|
|
|
|
10/06/2005 11:14:14 PM · #5 |
Photozone.de has review of both the Canon and the Sigma's 70-200.
|
|
|
|
10/07/2005 06:01:55 AM · #6 |
A bump for the morning people.
Any photo's from the 10-20?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/02/2025 03:29:03 AM EDT.
