Author | Thread |
|
04/14/2006 11:31:51 AM · #1 |
for those who are interested in B&W photography (like me) here's a new try to add near realistic film grain with Photoshop.
it is an action that also contains the Russell Brown layers
seeking realistic film grain
action works only in CS2 and is kind of CPU intensive.. more info in the included pdf..
|
|
|
06/22/2006 05:36:57 AM · #2 |
since it was asked there is now the option to use Channel Mixer for BW conversion instead of Russel Brown method. New version of action-set is uploaded.

|
|
|
06/22/2006 05:39:26 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by nikant: for those who are interested in B&W photography (like me) here's a new try to add near realistic film grain with Photoshop. |
I'm interested to see some examples from that action, please! |
|
|
06/22/2006 06:01:29 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by crayon: Originally posted by nikant: for those who are interested in B&W photography (like me) here's a new try to add near realistic film grain with Photoshop. |
I'm interested to see some examples from that action, please! |
well.. action has different effects if you run it at full sized images (out of the camera) or resized ones (i.e. for the web)
you can see some examples at my gallery
//nikant.white-tree.net/gallery/index.php?id=224
//nikant.white-tree.net/gallery/index.php?id=239
//nikant.white-tree.net/gallery/index.php?id=234
its really best to try it yourself since results vary
quick and dirty:
- method 1: use at full size images (for printing) and then resize for the web to show smoother grain
- method 2: first resize for the web and then run the action over it for more intence grain
---
info about the action internals can be found here: //www.outbackphoto.com/workflow/wf_95/essay.html
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 06:02:21.
|
|
|
06/22/2006 06:52:01 AM · #5 |
For the size of those shots by nikant, I think they are a bit too grainy.
Give me a bit, I can post up some scans of B&W negatives I have.
Here you go..
Resized Full Scan of Image.
Full Size Cropped part of the image.

Message edited by author 2006-06-22 07:02:37. |
|
|
06/22/2006 07:11:56 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by Nelzie: For the size of those shots by nikant, I think they are a bit too grainy.
|
well when talking about film it depends what film, what scanning method what scanner etc.
i.e. a scanned BW negative in Minolta film scanner from a friend: //harris.xanthopoulos.gr/index.php?id=738
//harris.xanthopoulos.gr/index.php?id=743
//harris.xanthopoulos.gr/index.php?id=1060
Message edited by author 2006-06-22 07:12:20.
|
|
|
06/22/2006 07:28:40 AM · #7 |
|
|
06/22/2006 08:52:57 AM · #8 |
Nice...I'm on my work computer so I can't try it myself, but here is an actual film negative that I scanned with a cheap low-end Canon scanner (it was like $50).
 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 07:56:32 AM EDT.