Author | Thread |
|
09/27/2007 05:56:13 PM · #51 |
I'm just having some fun being difficult and having fun. I really don't think we should start over either. You are right this is going slow - flickr had some going very fast at time.
My comment about 3 and up not being valid by the "rules" - What I was saying was we do not under the rules have valid 3. Therefore we cannot post the next number until we get a valid. The 4, 5, 6, etc may by themselves meet all the other rules, but the "post in sequence rule" has not been met. We in essence posted a 4 before we had a valid 3. So none of those numbers from four and up can be considered valid.
edited for spelling........
Message edited by author 2007-09-27 17:57:19. |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:02:59 PM · #52 |
Not sure if I can follow the discussion, but I give 31 a chance
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:28:09 PM · #53 |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:40:19 PM · #54 |
|
|
09/28/2007 09:58:31 AM · #55 |
|
|
09/28/2007 10:54:05 AM · #56 |
|
|
09/29/2007 12:42:42 PM · #57 |
|
|
09/29/2007 02:31:42 PM · #58 |
|
|
10/02/2007 09:14:24 PM · #59 |
I've got a 39 just waiting to post it....anyone with a 38?
|
|
|
10/02/2007 09:16:20 PM · #60 |
Originally posted by KarenNfld: I've got a 39 just waiting to post it....anyone with a 38? |
Egads, I'm getting dumber... my original thought involved my house number, which actually involves #39. So this was a very last minute substitute :)
Message edited by author 2007-10-02 21:23:04. |
|
|
10/03/2007 01:30:38 PM · #61 |
Geez... didn't mean to kill the thread...!
 |
|
|
10/03/2007 01:44:22 PM · #62 |
Missed it!
[thumb]594792[/thumb]
|
|
|
10/03/2007 03:20:32 PM · #63 |
I know the number is really small and that it does not meet the requirements - so this does not count !
I just thought it was funny, opening page 41 of this book of mine (Graphic Design, Now by Charlotte & Peter Fiell )
You can find inspiration in anything. |
|
|
10/03/2007 06:30:32 PM · #64 |
|
|
10/03/2007 06:51:21 PM · #65 |
|
|
10/03/2007 06:56:26 PM · #66 |
[thumb]594814[/thumb]
Finally got a chance Woohoo
|
|
|
10/05/2007 09:58:00 AM · #67 |
Okay who has 45????? Did I kill this thread??? I would find a 45 but the rules say no one person can post two in a row!!!! Come on guys.
Bump ... bump.
|
|
|
10/05/2007 10:44:57 AM · #68 |
Originally posted by loriprophoto: ...but the rules say no one person can post two in a row!!!! |
Eeep, well... I already broke THAT rule... |
|
|
10/05/2007 04:23:55 PM · #69 |
Originally posted by loriprophoto: I would find a 45 but the rules say no one person can post two in a row!!!! |
Rules say: No more than 2-in-a-row from the same member, so two in a row seems ok. |
|
|
10/05/2007 06:59:21 PM · #70 |
Okay so how about a pic someone??????? |
|
|
10/20/2007 02:55:08 PM · #71 |
I have been waiting to get a chance to get this one for about three weeks. I am very surprised that someone has not already come up with a 45. I has to be one of the easier numbers to get.
 |
|
|
10/23/2007 09:27:17 PM · #72 |
LOL. You definitely beat me to it - I took the shot on Saturday and haven't had time to post it. |
|
|
10/23/2007 10:25:42 PM · #73 |
|
|
10/28/2007 12:11:11 AM · #74 |
[thumb]605436[/thumb]
Camera display, part of an image number. Hand held at 1/4 sec.
|
|
|
11/17/2007 12:15:05 PM · #75 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 06:17:45 PM EDT.