| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/05/2007 03:09:15 PM · #26 |
1) Yes.
(note, this is a female responding) |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 03:50:33 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by Spazmo99:
Originally posted by robs:
Years ago I ran across a great (sadly also pretty accurate) definition of the movie classifications (don't even start me on the censorship thing)
G = The goodie gets the girl
PG = The baddie gets the girl
R = Everybody gets the girl
:-) |
You forgot X = Everybody gets the girl and she wants more. |
or X = Every body gets the girl at one time and in every possible position. |
Yeah, I thought about putting that in but.... Let see... I think it goes back to lighting... X everyone still gets the girl but you get to see more cause they don't crop or use shadows in the final cut :-)
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 03:58:49 PM · #28 |
| Id say it could be fine art, as long as the photographer and the client or whoever wants it is mature enough to handel it. I wouldnt classafye** it as porn because porn would be more of a sex act being done, or a photo that is concentrating on sex rater beauty. id put it on my wall:P |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 04:09:00 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by alanfreed:
Originally posted by TCGuru:
A penis, in my humble opinion, is never beautiful. |
Well... I guess I won't post my artistic Leaning Tower of Penis shot, then. |
Please tell me you are joking... |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 04:27:59 PM · #30 |
The original shot would be interesting in b/w. It would lose the clinical feel it has in color and the shapes would stand out more and make me think of it more as 'art', whatever that is.
Regardless, it's also a perfect example of why there is a Clone tool. Art, Porn or Medical Documentary - I have no desire to be looking at ass hairs.... |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 04:31:31 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
I have no desire to be looking at ass hairs.... |
LM(hairy)AO!
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 04:46:07 PM · #32 |
Yes, of course. It's only a subject.
And (thinking out loud while reading this thread) why shouldn't art be ugly. Aesthetics ain't the whole story.
Message edited by author 2007-10-05 16:48:18. |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 04:53:09 PM · #33 |
| I like the photo personally... (I'm female and not lesbian btw) I think its very artistic, its a subject, just like the folds of a rose.. i see no difference. I do find the hustler type photos not art, but this is clearly an artistic image. |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 05:37:58 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by aerogurl:
I like the photo personally... (I'm female and not lesbian btw) |
My name is Azzz, I am male and a lesbian....
Welcome to the group Azzz...
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 05:53:41 PM · #35 |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 06:16:20 PM · #36 |
I've always thought 'fine art' best described as works done by masters of (any given) craft. The distinction has always been more about the technicals & mastery of very FINE (subtle) differences in quality, and the artists ability to command them.
COULD i create a 'fine art' work of my nether-regions? Sure, just give me a 200mm Macro lens @ 1:1 ratio, a gas-powered weedeater, and some corn syrup & stand back!!!
Now, if I wander around the mall trying to sell blurry 4x6's of this atrocity, I'd be called a pervert. Print that thing @ 48"x72", place it in a private gallery, and charge $17,000 for limited edition prints? Hmmmmmmmmm
"Glenda, do we have any bottles of Karo syrup????????"
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 06:20:02 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by Azrifel:
Originally posted by aerogurl:
I like the photo personally... (I'm female and not lesbian btw) |
My name is Azzz, I am male and a lesbian....
Welcome to the group Azzz... |
Holy S**T!!!
I'm a lesbian too.(man...I only wish)
Awesome!
Message edited by author 2007-10-05 18:20:48. |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 06:27:43 PM · #38 |
I really do think that genitalia could be made into art. However, I think it may take a genius to make it look appealing without being sexually suggestive a.k.a. porn because I personally find it to be generally ugly. Now take into consideration that I like nude photography very much and I live in northern california where it is very liberal, but I just think dangling labia, a yellowish tint, and a zoomed in arsehole are very visually unattractive. Again, I think it can be made to be beautiful if done properly, but that first pic is @#$%.
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 06:52:27 PM · #39 |
Originally posted by TCGuru:
A penis, in my humble opinion, is never beautiful. |
Oh, I totally disagree. I think they are gooooooooooooooorgeous! |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 06:57:50 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by dudephil:
Originally posted by TCGuru:
A penis, in my humble opinion, is never beautiful. |
Oh, I totally disagree. I think they are gooooooooooooooorgeous! |
Is there something we should know about you, dude? ;) |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 07:05:35 PM · #41 |
I'm sorry, I just have to tell this story...
Having a discussion with a male friend and I asked him why men are always so eager to have a threesome with two women but rarely a woman and a man. I was really curious about the male viewpoint.
His answer?
"It can be summed up in one word; "scrotums". They're the ugliest things in the world. I don't have to see my own and I certainly don't want to see anyone else's!"
Hmm... very profound.... :)
edit cuz I found his exact words and the way he put it was funnier than the way I remembered it...
Message edited by author 2007-10-05 19:11:38. |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 07:08:26 PM · #42 |
Seriously, ball sack looks like left-over elbow skin with a couple of marbles thrown in. Not an attractive thing. :-)
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 07:09:54 PM · #43 |
| In other words, only certain parts of genitalia can become fine art? |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 07:17:07 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by BeeCee:
In other words, only certain parts of genitalia can become fine art? |
...I am courios to know what part of genitalia could become art and why other no...... |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 07:23:23 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by BeeCee:
In other words, only certain parts of genitalia can become fine art? |
Someone much wiser than I, PM'd me and told me that anything can be the subject of fine art.
If you can convince the aristocracy that ball sack photos are en vogue, I will fly up and model for you :-)
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 07:24:44 PM · #46 |
Originally posted by Blue Moon:
I really do think that genitalia could be made into art. However, I think it may take a genius to make it look appealing without being sexually suggestive a.k.a. porn because I personally find it to be generally ugly. Now take into consideration that I like nude photography very much and I live in northern california where it is very liberal, but I just think dangling labia, a yellowish tint, and a zoomed in arsehole are very visually unattractive. Again, I think it can be made to be beautiful if done properly, but that first pic is @#$%. |
Amen. And it is not "cute" ugly either (like a pug or bulldog) LOL |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 09:26:25 PM · #47 |
Originally posted by TCGuru:
Amen. And it is not "cute" ugly either (like a pug or bulldog) LOL |
Ummm... Ok. So what part of the body would you say is "cute ugly like a pug or bulldog?" ;) |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 09:51:33 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by _eug:
Originally posted by TCGuru:
Amen. And it is not "cute" ugly either (like a pug or bulldog) LOL |
Ummm... Ok. So what part of the body would you say is "cute ugly like a pug or bulldog?" ;) |
My first guess would be aged boobies... lol
|
|
|
|
10/05/2007 09:53:31 PM · #49 |
Can a photo of privates be fine art?
A photo of my junk will never be fine nor art...
:-P |
|
|
|
10/05/2007 09:55:43 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
A photo of my junk will never be fine nor art...
|
Good art evokes an emotional response...
Hmmmm...
Message edited by author 2007-10-05 21:56:00.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/13/2025 02:27:41 AM EDT.
