| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/04/2004 07:58:20 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by karmat:
Originally posted by Gordon:
Do any serious film photographic clubs have a 1-hour photo challenge?
If not, why not ? |
Because they have forgotten how fun it is to just play sometimes.
:-P
|
Hey, I'm not against the idea :)
|
|
|
|
02/04/2004 08:08:19 AM · #27 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
Originally posted by karmat:
Originally posted by Gordon:
Do any serious film photographic clubs have a 1-hour photo challenge?
If not, why not ? |
Because they have forgotten how fun it is to just play sometimes.
:-P
|
Hey, I'm not against the idea :) |
The Toronto Camera Club runs an annual event whereby participants are given a roll of film and told to shoot over a one week period. The film is developed by a one-hour lab and then an image is submitted for judging. All in all a great deal of fun.
|
|
|
|
02/04/2004 08:52:19 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by leaf:
why do we need to rotate |
I think the intent was to allow rotating 90º to allow for both portrait and landscape orientation shots and not to allow "arbitrary rotation" to fix a crooked horizon. |
|
|
|
02/04/2004 10:15:43 AM · #29 |
That sounds like a great idea. I am all for a challenge with those rules. However please make it an open challenge so I can participate!!
|
|
|
|
02/04/2004 10:17:27 AM · #30 |
I think it's a great idea, every few months. It's a different kind of challenge.
|
|
|
|
02/04/2004 09:53:09 PM · #31 |
|
|
|
02/07/2004 08:28:00 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by kaycee:
I'm all for that! Most of my entries would fit that challenge - 'course my scores show it, but that's okay with me. |
Yeah, me too kaycee.... MOST of my images score low due to the fact that I don't fix anything.... but oh well. :) |
|
|
|
02/24/2004 04:15:27 PM · #33 |
I think this would be fantastic.
In fact, I would simply make a third "Challenge Rules" along with "Basic Editing" and "Advanced Editing" editing rules.
Limit the editing to only rotation to fix landscape/portrait issues.
Photo journalism comes alive in this category.
|
|
|
|
02/24/2004 04:32:35 PM · #34 |
| Out-of-camera includes raw images? There's a number of parameters that can be adjusted when converting from raw to jpeg. Those that cannot capture in raw mode may be at a slight disadvantage. |
|
|
|
02/24/2004 05:13:45 PM · #35 |
| Anybody shooting "raw" would have to "develop" their picture "as shoot"; i.e., no exposure, white balance, etc. adjustments in the raw conversion software; just the "as shot" settings. |
|
|
|
02/24/2004 05:47:22 PM · #36 |
| Not that I think this is a bad idea, but it seems like people with "prosumer" cameras like the Minolta A1 would have a bit of an advantage. Older digicams don't have great exposure control or in-camera picture enhancement. DSLRs are soft and not as saturated by design. At least some degree of editing levels the field. |
|
|
|
02/24/2004 07:49:59 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by Dyslexic:
Not that I think this is a bad idea, but it seems like people with "prosumer" cameras like the Minolta A1 would have a bit of an advantage. Older digicams don't have great exposure control or in-camera picture enhancement. DSLRs are soft and not as saturated by design. At least some degree of editing levels the field. |
There is already a "Basic Editing" challenge to cover this. |
|
|
|
02/25/2004 08:31:59 AM · #38 |
I think this is a great idea.
And for a guy like me, who's still starting out, I'll get some great examples of composition... |
|
|
|
02/25/2004 10:13:57 AM · #39 |
Originally posted by EddyG:
Anybody shooting "raw" would have to "develop" their picture "as shoot"; i.e., no exposure, white balance, etc. adjustments in the raw conversion software; just the "as shot" settings. |
Or they could always go mad and shoot in JPEG mode.
|
|
|
|
02/25/2004 10:23:56 AM · #40 |
WooHoo!!! I am for this 100% Like Kaycee, I tend to suffer from the "straight from the camera" syndrome, and my scores show it. But as I said before, I am proud of what I do with my camera! I couldn't be more proud of Aura.... which was only despeckled (due to a lightened pixel) but ..... anyway.... I am babbling.
I am up for a straight from the camera challenge.... nothing but resizing.... that's it! :) I think this would be a good challenge for those who depend on PS to tidy up their images. :)
|
|
|
|
02/25/2004 11:46:57 AM · #41 |
Originally posted by PaulMdx:
Your town/village/city - Document how your town looks in February 2004 using photography. (This could also be cool for a tryptic challenge.) |
Or why not narrow this one down even further and call it Your Street
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 06:51:55 PM EDT.
