| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/24/2008 05:04:51 PM · #1 |
70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS Image Stabilizer USM Autofocus Lens vs. EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Autofocus Lens
Is there really a $500 difference? Yes, I know it's L glass, but...
|
|
|
|
01/24/2008 05:19:07 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
01/24/2008 05:28:13 PM · #3 |
| This might help... Click here |
|
|
|
01/24/2008 05:28:45 PM · #4 |
| If you're OK with the range, the 70-200 will give you top image quality at all focal lengths, constant aperture, better bokeh and weather sealing. The 70-300 is ALMOST L-quality (it suffers slightly at the ends of its range), it's slower, has a "consumer" build quality and no weather sealing, but it's also more compact (easier to handle and less conspicuous) and gives you another 100mm of zoom for less money. How you value those qualities will determine your choice. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/02/2025 01:54:45 PM EDT.
