Author | Thread |
|
09/17/2008 11:27:21 AM · #1 |
I am going cross eyed looking at these glasses.
So what is the equivalent of a 70-200 in Tamron and a 24-70, or at least the closest to it??
Anyone?? |
|
|
09/17/2008 11:36:10 AM · #2 |
Tamron 70-200 and 28-75, respectively. Of those, the 28-75 is a very good deal that offers image quality comparable to the Canon at a much lower price. For the telephoto I'd rather have Canon's 70-200 f/4L, with or without stabilization. |
|
|
09/17/2008 11:41:19 AM · #3 |
Hey Mr S, have I told you recently that you are brilliant!!! ;) |
|
|
09/17/2008 12:15:55 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by JulietNN: Hey Mr S, have I told you recently that you are brilliant!!! ;) |
Sheesh, Juliet; you were HERE and I was using BOTH those lenses; you even played around with my 70-200 f/4L... Remember...
JejejeĆ¢Ā¢
R. |
|
|
09/17/2008 12:24:41 PM · #5 |
I thought I played with the 10-22
|
|
|
09/17/2008 12:29:56 PM · #6 |
Basically, it boils down to this, I was looking at a package deal with those two Canon lenes and a 5d body for 2 grand.
Then I looked at individual lens to see if it was cheaper. I have an 18-55, 10-22, and 75-300, so didnt want to repeat those lenes.
then I found a used Mark iii for 800 on b&H
Then I looked at the 50d then the upgrade, and now I am so damn confused that my head is spinning and I am not going to buy anything cos I am lost in the sea of bodys and lenes |
|
|
09/17/2008 12:37:37 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by JulietNN: Basically, it boils down to this, I was looking at a package deal with those two Canon lenes and a 5d body for 2 grand.
Then I looked at individual lens to see if it was cheaper. I have an 18-55, 10-22, and 75-300, so didnt want to repeat those lenes.
then I found a used Mark iii for 800 on b&H
Then I looked at the 50d then the upgrade, and now I am so damn confused that my head is spinning and I am not going to buy anything cos I am lost in the sea of bodys and lenes |
So basically you cannot make your mind up..... typical!
*GRIN*
|
|
|
09/17/2008 04:44:36 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by JulietNN: Basically, it boils down to this, I was looking at a package deal with those two Canon lenes and a 5d body for 2 grand. |
that price seems very cheap. Have you checked the seller's reputation on Reseller Ratings? |
|
|
09/17/2008 04:53:49 PM · #9 |
I recently replaced my Canon 17-85 IS with the Tamron 28-75 2.8 and I've been happy with it although I do miss the image stabilization. I wanted the 2.8 for doing weddings and I also knew my next DSLR would be a full frame the the Canon 17-85 wasn't going to work on the full frame. I had heard good things about it and didn't want the price and weight of the Canon 24-70 and then I heard Will Crocket at ShootSmarter saying great things about it so I went for it. It's been good but haven't yet run it through any true sharpness tests like shooting a grid etc. |
|
|
09/17/2008 05:05:55 PM · #10 |
The 5D at my office sports a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/10/2025 07:03:06 PM EDT.