DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

Threads will be shown in descending order for the remainder of this session. To permanently display posts in this order, adjust your preferences.
DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Canon EF 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6 Image Stabilizer Lens
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 10 of 10, descending (reverse)
AuthorThread
07/30/2009 07:09:29 PM · #1
I got this lens in May and used it for a few days at Disney World. While it was convenient, even for just holiday shots I was not impressed with the image quality. Don't get me wrong, it is possible to get some good quality shots but the conditions need to be ideal.

I spent 2 days shooting for the pigeons challenge. The first day I used this lens, the second I used my 70-300mm Canon lens. The difference in the quality of the shots was very noticeable, even though the conditions were similar. Ironically the shot I entered was taken with this lens and it did quite well, but I think that was more because of how I processed the image than the fact that it was a great technical shot.

My take on this lens is that it's great if you want convenience. If you want image quality go for something else.
07/30/2009 05:37:15 PM · #2
Originally posted by mjongstra:

Originally posted by KarenNfld:

This lens?

I just got it a couple of weeks ago to replace my Sigma. I love it, very sharp.


Very sharp at 200 as well?


Yes, pretty sharp. Much sharper than the Sigma. Sharper at 200 than my 75-300 is at 200.
07/30/2009 05:29:59 PM · #3
I purchased this lens a few weeks ago as a replacement for my busticated 17-85. It has not come off the camera since. I quite like it and am very pleased with the images it produces.
07/30/2009 02:49:00 PM · #4
Originally posted by KarenNfld:

This lens?

I just got it a couple of weeks ago to replace my Sigma. I love it, very sharp.


Very sharp at 200 as well?
07/30/2009 02:32:35 PM · #5
This lens?

I just got it a couple of weeks ago to replace my Sigma. I love it, very sharp.
07/30/2009 02:02:09 PM · #6
For the tele part I personally would (and will :P)go with the 70-200 f4 L USM. As for a wide lens dunno... :D
07/30/2009 01:43:55 PM · #7
Nikon makes a great 18-200 lense so i'm interested as well to know how good the canon model is
07/30/2009 12:56:52 PM · #8
I will be interested in the replies to this, as I was considering buying it (or a third party similar ranged zoom) for travelling. Without any doubt you will lose on quality with an all-purpose super-zoom, but I don't know how much.
07/30/2009 12:56:33 PM · #9
The bigger the gap between the wide and tele ends of a lens the more mediocre the lens will be. There is an L lens that is 28-300 which goes against the norm but it has a price to match.

You'd be better off with probably the 17-85 IS and the 70-200 L IS (2.8 or 4).
07/30/2009 12:52:25 PM · #10
Is this lens good at all? Or is it better to buy 2 separate lens to cover both wide and tele? If yes, what do you suggest?

Thanks.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 05/18/2022 06:44:38 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2022 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Proudly hosted by Sargasso Networks. Current Server Time: 05/18/2022 06:44:38 PM EDT.