DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

Threads will be shown in descending order for the remainder of this session. To permanently display posts in this order, adjust your preferences.
DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Hoods
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 31, descending (reverse)
AuthorThread
05/18/2007 02:56:37 PM · #1
Originally posted by boomtap:

I need a bigger hood.


I need to get out of the hood :-D
05/18/2007 01:37:58 PM · #2
I need a bigger hood.
05/18/2007 12:09:47 PM · #3
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:


hoods are something you pay extra for with most canon lenses (cheap b@st..)


Only if you're a cheap b@st... and don't buy L glass.
05/18/2007 11:17:07 AM · #4
hoods block sun flares (which can be artistic)
hoods block light that kills contrast (no saving an image like this)
hoods are a mechanical protection against bumping things and damaging the front element

hoods are something you pay extra for with most canon lenses (cheap b@st..)
hoods are a PITA if use a belt system or change lenses often as now each change requires 'assembly' of the lens
hoods a PITA if you use an expodisc, PL filters, cokin filters, etc
05/18/2007 10:33:29 AM · #5
Originally posted by skylen:

Also, it's worth noting that you can print your own lens hoods. There was a thread on this a while back.


Just amazing - what a nice thing to do for folks who don't want to spend the money. Best comment left on the site: "OK, so where's the website for cutout D200's, 18-200VR's, etc?"
05/18/2007 09:59:17 AM · #6
I am currently waiting for the UPS driver to drop off a hood from B&H for one of my lenses right now.
05/18/2007 09:12:49 AM · #7
Also, it's worth noting that you can print your own lens hoods. There was a thread on this a while back.
05/18/2007 08:29:28 AM · #8
Thanks for all the help
05/17/2007 11:49:38 PM · #9
Originally posted by Elvis_L:

Originally posted by crayon:

Originally posted by levyj413:

So unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?

shooting directly into the sun? no lens hood gonna be THAT good.


thats when you break out the lightsphere:)


LMAO

To answer the question it's when the sun is coming across the lens, not directly at it.
05/17/2007 11:45:26 PM · #10
Originally posted by levyj413:

So to draaaaaag this back to the original question, unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?


Flare and it helps protect the front element on the lens. I always have a hood on my lens when walking around with my camera over my shoulder and sometimes when I am shooting studio style.
05/17/2007 11:44:48 PM · #11
Originally posted by crayon:

Originally posted by levyj413:

So unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?

shooting directly into the sun? no lens hood gonna be THAT good.


thats when you break out the lightsphere:)
05/17/2007 11:43:52 PM · #12
Originally posted by levyj413:

So unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?

shooting directly into the sun? no lens hood gonna be THAT good.
05/17/2007 11:43:42 PM · #13
Originally posted by levyj413:

So to draaaaaag this back to the original question, unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?


i never use mine.
05/17/2007 11:42:35 PM · #14
Originally posted by levyj413:

So to draaaaaag this back to the original question, unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?


As long as it does not restrict the lens or vignette it might be a good idea to use it if you have it. You might get into a situation where you didnt think youd need it and save a shot.

I could be wrong.
05/17/2007 11:41:25 PM · #15
So to draaaaaag this back to the original question, unless you're shooting into the sun (or, presumably, another bright light source), a lens hood isn't really all that useful?
05/17/2007 11:39:53 PM · #16
Originally posted by Elvis_L:

I hear gary fong uses a 12 inch refractor telescope.

and i thought he was all about using transparent rice bowls on his flashes XD
05/17/2007 11:33:10 PM · #17
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Originally posted by Elvis_L:

I hear gary fong uses a 12 inch refractor telescope.


He's compensating for something and it's definitely not money.


you got that right.
05/17/2007 11:32:22 PM · #18
Originally posted by Elvis_L:

I hear gary fong uses a 12 inch refractor telescope.


He's compensating for something and it's definitely not money.
05/17/2007 11:30:26 PM · #19
Originally posted by crayon:

Originally posted by RainMotorsports:


Yeah but would you ever shoot a wedding with one (Assuming youd shoot a wedding in 35mm with a 50 and now using a K10D with its crop factor a 40 shows a bit closer)

i'm not certain if it is best to judge lenses by means of wedding events alone. for if that's the case i would see telephoto lenses as far useless! :)


What do you mean, I see people use the bigma all the time. I hear gary fong uses a 12 inch refractor telescope.

05/17/2007 11:26:36 PM · #20
Originally posted by RainMotorsports:


Yeah but would you ever shoot a wedding with one (Assuming youd shoot a wedding in 35mm with a 50 and now using a K10D with its crop factor a 40 shows a bit closer)

i'm not certain if it is best to judge lenses by means of wedding events alone. for if that's the case i would see telephoto lenses as far useless! :)

Message edited by author 2007-05-17 23:26:59.
05/17/2007 10:51:08 PM · #21
Originally posted by RainMotorsports:

Then again i guess most people dont shoot weddings with a 50 1.8 these days?


My lens of choice during the ceremony, especially if flash is forbidden.
05/17/2007 10:49:49 PM · #22
Originally posted by crayon:

Originally posted by RainMotorsports:

Pancake lenses need a hood to pass them selves off as lenses and get laughed at less! They also help add a minor amount of counter weight that the lens lacks..... J/K


i actually find pancake lenses very attractive!
they seem to have this cool factor about them ;)


Yeah but would you ever shoot a wedding with one (Assuming youd shoot a wedding in 35mm with a 50 and now using a K10D with its crop factor a 40 shows a bit closer)

It would look ridiculous. Then again i guess most people dont shoot weddings with a 50 1.8 these days? Not sure I have several 35mm SLR's and all i have is 50mm Prime's for each lol.
05/17/2007 10:46:34 PM · #23
Originally posted by RainMotorsports:

Pancake lenses need a hood to pass them selves off as lenses and get laughed at less! They also help add a minor amount of counter weight that the lens lacks..... J/K


i actually find pancake lenses very attractive!
they seem to have this cool factor about them ;)
05/17/2007 10:45:36 PM · #24
They're also useful at protecting the front of your lens from bumping into things
05/17/2007 10:42:47 PM · #25
Pancake lenses need a hood to pass them selves off as lenses and get laughed at less! They also help add a minor amount of counter weight that the lens lacks..... J/K

' . substr('//tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:NoFUFpqnLETXdM://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/largeimages/366728.jpg', strrpos('//tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:NoFUFpqnLETXdM://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/largeimages/366728.jpg', '/') + 1) . '

Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/22/2021 07:53:10 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2021 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Proudly hosted by Sargasso Networks. Current Server Time: 01/22/2021 07:53:10 AM EST.