Author | Thread |
|
11/17/2004 09:53:59 AM |
I just want to add a note to my previous post on this shot.
Yes, it's not a digital filter (and yes, I s'pose I'll have to sart eating!) but all I would say is that the filter was not used to its best potential due to the 'falseness' of the end result. I would have chosen a less heavy-handed method of accentuation so that one remains focused on the scene and not an artificial enhancement.
: ) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/10/2004 06:52:46 PM |
oh wow, Matt!! This is rather ethereal in itself! What is the smoke that I see on the ground? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/08/2004 11:47:53 PM |
I'm afraid that I like *this* photograph about 10 times better than the one submitted.
I'm probably in an extremely small minority, however. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/08/2004 11:26:10 PM |
I do not know this photographer personally but I live within ten miles of where this shot was taken and that was the way the sky was for a couple of evenings. I believe the photographer when he says this is an unedited photo. He is on top of a small mountain putting him near these low lying clouds. Start eatting Imagineer. :) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/08/2004 06:21:25 PM |
Unedited - are you sure?
I can clearly see a graduated mask where it'appears' to be burned. If not then I eat my words, hat, head and everything, because the lighting cast on the ground in this scene looks impossible given the low, ominous gloom of the sky. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/01/2025 09:26:39 PM EDT.