Author | Thread |
|
11/22/2004 01:18:58 AM |
unbelieveable that this didnt ribbon, i thought it was the best. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
11/21/2004 11:51:54 PM |
Very clever of you to use noise and saturation to provide your brushstrokes. Good color palette and composition. The image could lean more toward pointillism than impressionism (which could cost you some votes), but a strong entry overall. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/21/2004 09:15:22 PM |
Some areas of the image work well with your effect, others are not so good. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/21/2004 03:20:00 PM |
This certainly has a painterly quality to it. I don't find 'painterly' necessary to meet the challenge, but this does. The compositon and colors are very well used here. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/21/2004 07:24:16 AM |
Invitational Challenge Level: Experienced
Challenge link: weak - although you have depicted an Impressionist style.
Image critique: Scene is OK, but it's important to grasp what the challenge is about. This is not photographic impressionism but filtered digital art and you've clearly misunderstood the aim here.
Out-of-challenge appeal: none for me, as the FX are crude and reminiscent of some initial experiments with Photoshop.
Score: 3 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/20/2004 03:26:06 AM |
Not sure if the noise was intentionally introduced, but it detracts from a magnificent scene. I would rank this higher if the noise was better handled. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/19/2004 11:26:53 PM |
Looks photoshopped... I'll come back for a closer look though. Edit: I still think this is photoshop, as such it doesn't hold a whole lot of interest to me. The color noise is just too artificial. I cannot think of anything natural that would give bright cyan noise both on light white, on the fence, etc. I think this is just 'add noise' feature. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/19/2004 06:41:15 PM |
When I was thirtheen I had to study impressionism for my school. Beeing Dutch we were made familiar with Van Gogh and that lead to Pissaro, Monet, Manet and Degas. I've seen some paintings in real live and they made a good 'impression' on me.
The saturated colors and pointillism of this reminds me of that. The composition is pretty good as well. It is a wonderful picture. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/19/2004 11:29:04 AM |
Did the impressionists use digital noise? ; )
I have to admit that this is looking better than when I voted (+1 on its way!) but overall it still reminds me too much of a very noisy digital image. Otherwise, this is a nice scene to snap, and well composed.
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/18/2004 09:52:54 AM |
Vice nice good job, my wife loved it!
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/18/2004 07:52:13 AM |
I liked this a lot, but was disappointed on the tilt of the gazebo, could have used a slight rotation. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/17/2004 08:51:51 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/17/2004 05:47:59 PM |
The blue, most of the gazebo, the plants and fence look good. The roof and the trees look to jarring compared to the rest of the scene. I wonder if the photographer used selective sharpening for the effect. Hope it's in your notes. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/16/2004 10:00:59 PM |
Superb. Colors, texture, composition and light. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/16/2004 03:33:23 PM |
to much noice, wrong effect over saturated, sorry but I am not impressed with this one since you are a "master" |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/16/2004 12:27:16 PM |
meets the challenge for me - well executed, just wish the building wasn't tilting a little towards the right - 9 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/16/2004 03:03:15 AM |
Too much post editing. This would have looked better with a little blur or shot through milky glass or something. I just don't really care for a picture that is obviously post edited. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/16/2004 12:50:43 AM |
Must be the winner. meets this challenge but is also a wonderful photograph, this is IT. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/15/2004 11:43:01 PM |
returning for comments.
A cute effect but resembling more the pointilistic style, yet the colors a very charming . Bumping up. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/15/2004 07:12:06 PM |
there are a lot of things i like about this image, and a lot of things i could like about this image. the post processing is not one of them. i am trying to judge each image as to how it makes me feel as opposed to the mechanics involved either in camera or post-processing. i'm sorry, but this one just feels, to me, that you had to go to far to get the result. if i'm wrong, i'll gladly retract and eat my words. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/15/2004 11:03:57 AM |
Beautiful effect, but IMO has completely violated photographic integrity. 2 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/15/2004 10:09:56 AM |
great conversion to Impressionism - looks like Renoir did it |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/15/2004 09:06:40 AM |
I think this would have been much butter with just the blur, the noise doesn't really do it for me. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/15/2004 04:18:05 AM |
Nice shot, this really is what impressionism is all about. 10. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/04/2025 11:18:04 AM EDT.