| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
04/05/2005 09:26:43 PM |
| Interesting composition, but the dog needs to be sharper. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/05/2005 04:15:00 PM |
| The sky is way to washed out in this photo. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/04/2005 06:37:08 PM |
| if the focus was supposed to be on the "Heavens and Earth", the dog is intruding :) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/03/2005 06:53:04 AM |
| Nice shot.. just the dog in the frame is a bit distracting. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/03/2005 03:47:45 AM |
| Nice idea. I think for this challenge the shot would have been better without the dog. The sky is a bit "washed out" |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/31/2005 08:58:17 AM |
| For a focus on the sky pic, you really need to avoid blowing the detail in the clouds - slightly underexpose and playwith levels to "develop" it correctly in PS. Nice composition though (I like non-standard shapes and patterns of composition). |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 09:29:40 PM |
| Pretty shot but I might have found something other than the dog to give it perspective. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 12:16:01 PM |
| There is a growing trend to place people or (or dogs or cows) in corners of photos of natural places to 'spruce them up a bit' , 'you know, add interest.' While indisputably they can provide a focal point and even a sense of scale they do frequently ruin the shot IMO. If it is to be in this frame, the four legged animal is at a perfect place in the frame. But if the photo is about that being, then we are just a tad too far away. On the other hand if the photo is about that animal's environment, then we are very much too close - the animal should be out of site. Why do I go on about it? I like the sand and the water. I like the sky in its pale tones and even the blown-out clouds. I believe that were the animal removed, there would be more exposure space for the sand and sky and their details could be expressed. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 11:31:54 AM |
| the clouds could use a bit more contrast in my opinions...the white about the dog (?) is overpowering my eyes are drawn to that spot. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 11:22:57 AM |
| Beautiful photo! - - Is that a boxer? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 09:50:21 AM |
| This is a nice image. I love how bright it is and how powerful it is. The coloring is really nice. I like the way the clouds look . Nice work. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 12:35:17 AM |
Now that looks like an outtake for the "pet portrait" challenge.
Too bad this is an open challenge, a little dodging and burning would do wonders for this imense blue sky! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/30/2005 12:31:05 AM |
What's the dog doing there? Your title might be read to imply that that is god examining his creation. I find this interpretation vaguely amusing, particularly because of the intensity with which the dog seems to be examining the ground. Almost as if to say, "Dang! I missed a spot!"
|
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 06:24:58 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
