| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/19/2003 12:29:37 AM |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
06/17/2003 11:54:26 PM |
| I can't see this ever showing up on a playboy cover (but I decided to not take off for that, since I generally don't like the style of photos that do show up on mag covers). |
|
|
|
06/17/2003 04:18:32 PM |
| Not fond of the overall yellowy feel here. |
|
|
|
06/17/2003 04:56:34 AM |
|
|
|
06/15/2003 06:56:51 PM |
| Hmmmm.... interesting, but not the typical COVER of playboy, is it? |
|
|
|
06/14/2003 07:09:07 AM |
| I think you have chosen the wrong magazine for this photo. With all due respects but this photo would never make it to Playboy :). |
|
|
|
06/14/2003 06:37:15 AM |
| I don't think the angle would make this picture a candidate for a Playboy cover. The suggestiveness is a little too subtle - I'd wager something more direct would have worked better. People that buy Playboy don't want to think too hard (except those that buy it for the articles :)) |
|
|
|
06/13/2003 11:23:13 PM |
| Sexy. But the yellowish tone of the lighting doesn't suit it very well. The angle is also too unusual to make it work, although I can understand if you were trying for the effect without revealing TOO much. ;) |
|
|
|
06/13/2003 03:42:51 PM |
| I doubt Playboy would ever have a cover like that. I think they are a little more into the full body or almost full body shot on the cover. Cool shot though. |
|
|
|
06/13/2003 09:14:10 AM |
| nice legs but a little bit blurry. also color cast looks very yellowish. composition does not look OK also. = 4 |
|
|
|
06/13/2003 02:26:20 AM |
| Hehehehe, looks more like a "peep" shot taken from a hidden camera or something. |
|
|
|
06/12/2003 11:19:54 PM |
|
|
|
06/12/2003 06:34:27 PM |
| more like....bizarre magazine....really sexy and smooth...good job |
|
|
|
06/12/2003 02:22:13 PM |
| Playboy never has shots like this on the cover, unfortunately. Too abstract and arty. |
|
|
|
06/12/2003 12:04:58 PM |
| Not sexy at all. Don't like the angle of the shot. 1 |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 09:54:38 PM |
| I'm sure you'll hear from some people who are just plainly prudish and will mark you down for even uttering the idea of Playboy... but I'm not one of those. The problem is that this honestly isn't even in the realm of quality that they would use. I don't mean to sound harsh... but the yellowish-reddish coloration is disturbing, and the angle is not at all flattering or erotic here. Again, I don't mean to sound rude... I just feel that I should justify shots that I score low. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 12:39:38 PM |
| so blurry.. sorry, but i cant imagine a playboy cover like this.. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 12:29:55 PM |
| Nice but the lightning doesn't seem to work here. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 10:27:39 AM |
| i don't see this as a cover, sorry, 1. |
|
|
|
06/11/2003 03:38:30 AM |
| a different perspective for Playboy - |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/14/2025 08:24:45 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
