Author | Thread |
|
06/15/2011 03:52:51 AM |
I quite like this. I hope you don't mind if I copy you one day. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/19/2006 10:22:26 AM |
***Greetings from the critique club***
alright, lets see,
first off i must say, when i first saw your image i was like huh?
then i thought i was like lava, until i read your description, then i realized what it was.
I enjoy the color, its dark but its bright at the same time, which really adds to the texture,
it has great texture, i like how the lines are not from front to rear, their more like front left to rear right, which is good, i would have knocked you if it was just straight back,
ok, so your color, its great, except i think it would have been better if it was consistent throughout, the back has a big dark spot that as i read your commments cost you a few votes
over all i enjoy your photo, there is just some issues with the consistency of the color, and maybe a bigger DOF |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2006 11:14:12 AM |
The photos that really did well in this challenge really emphasized the texture with bright highlights and dark shadows. This photo with the backlighting doesn't emphasize the great texture of your subject. I don't think it's a bad photo, I think it just didn't move people to vote it at the next level. The voting breakdown pretty much proves that by the lack of super low and super high votes.
~Mark |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2006 09:41:59 AM |
Not sure why this didn't score better. I can almost feel it just looking at it! I was one of your 7s. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2006 07:16:38 AM |
I personally think this is a wonderful image and a good example of "texture" I like the colors and the perspective is OK... I think a little more "tilt" might add a little more interest to the image. There are two things that I can put my finger on that may have affected voting.
1.) It is not a "recognizable" image. Granted, I don't feel like it needs to be recognizable to qualify as a "texture", but I did notice the top three images were "recognizable". Again, I have not looked at any of the other entries, so this is simply pure speculation, but it is possible that voters considered this more of an abstract than a texture.
2.) The one thing that stands out the most to me is the very shallow DOF. For a "textures" image, the "texture" needs to be the main focus of the composition. You did capture a beautiful image and indeed a very interesting texture, but due to the shallow DOF, the texture is really only noticeable in the foreground of the image.
FWIW... I really like this image and probably would've given a 6 or 7 (depending on mood and other entries).
I hope this helps.
Message edited by author 2006-04-14 07:17:15. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/14/2006 06:27:51 AM |
I gave this a 4. To be honest, I don't remember this image strongly enough from voting to give purely 'retrospective' feedback. However, after reading your Photographer's Comments and looking more closely at the image now, I can see what it is and what you were likely aiming for. Perhaps just a little more context (still keeping it abstract'ish'), not quite so close (otherwise a macro (apologies in advance, doesn't look like you used a macro lens(?))) and perhaps a slight variation in the lighting and angle/perspective, especially to show the texture(s) more, may have made this better in my opinion. Overall a little dark and not enough 'pop', especially in the definitions of the textures either on the surface of the shell or the 'waves'. The lines and cropping are good. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
04/11/2006 08:20:31 PM |
like the abstract quality... good job |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/02/2025 03:02:07 PM EDT.