| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/08/2006 02:48:34 AM |
| Yes, that's much better :-) |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/08/2006 02:01:34 AM |
| This is nice, especially the trace of tree detail. Lovely "landscape without subject". If it were mine, I'd do some work on the sky; the color seems too cartoonish, it doesn't marry well with the other, more somber colors. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
04/08/2006 01:22:52 AM |
| So, is this a landscape scene or a wildlife scene? Not that there is anything wrong with a landscape scene containing a wildlife element. But, if that is the goal, then the ducks are a very minor and too far away element. Immediately noticeable is the dark nature of the tree area. Almost like a neutral density artifact, or transition, between the foreground and the sky. Certainly possible a cloud shaded the trees, but in this shot the sky looks pasted in because the trees are so "unnaturally" dark with a lack of detail. Overall a good image, but needs to have a better foreground anchor (like closer ducks) and a better transition between foreground and sky, other than a starkly dark forest. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/07/2025 09:29:48 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
