DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries

DQ'd
 
You are viewing the last image.
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
 This image was disqualified from the Beatles Song/Lyrics challenge.
Think for Yourself
Think for Yourself
Rikki


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Beatles Song/Lyrics (Advanced Editing IV*)
Camera: Canon EOS-20D
Lens: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro
Location: San Francisco, California
Date: May 27, 2006
Aperture: f5.6
ISO: 100
Shutter: 1/250 seconds
Galleries: Emotive, Architecture
Date Uploaded: May 30, 2006

Challenge Entry No. 271

Oh dear. I might just regret this entry.
Disqualification Details
Any attempts to alter the point totals in any way for any photograph will result in immediate loss of account and a ban from the site. Photographs by any participating parties may also be removed from past or current challenges.

Statistics
Views since voting: 686
Views during voting: 404
Comments: 7
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
06/08/2006 01:56:26 AM
Greetings from the Critique Club!

I really like the composition here. Fits the "rule" of thirds relatively well. The framing of the pillar and text above it are excellent. I think a little more space on the right side (to match the amount of space given on the left side) would have helped. Also because the sight-line of the statue leads the eye over to the frame. I think the composition would be better if you had taken a few steps to the right and shot this with the statue on the left side of the pillar and the text the same up above. Then the eye would go from the statue to the pillar up to the text and back around to the statue again.
As far as lighting, I really like it. The only thing that bothers me about the lighting is the top of the statue's head blends with the building in the background. The backlighting really helps the shot though; make the statue really pop out.
I looked up the text in a translator and found that it says "Honor and Fatherland." Not quite sure how that relates your image, but still cool.
I really like this in black and white as well. But I don't know if I like it better than the color version.

Meets the Challenge: the image matches the title and the title is a Beatles song, so yup!

Overall: The lighting is excellent (especially with such a dark foreground and bright background). The composition is good, but I think it could be better. It is a striking image because of the contrast of the darks and whites, but it doesn't speak to me that much.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
 Comments Made During the Challenge
06/06/2006 03:05:39 AM
Very nice! 8
  Photographer found comment helpful.
06/02/2006 01:01:05 AM
Using a new formula....
0-2 Meets the Challenge = 2
0-2 Technical Merit = 2
0-4 Interest/Creativity = 2
0-2 The "wow factor" = 0
Final score: 6
  Photographer found comment helpful.
06/01/2006 11:07:36 AM
...cause I won't be there for you... He certanly won't:-)
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/31/2006 07:48:41 PM
Legion of Honor... I have taken so many photos at that site! I submitted one here on this website called "Thinking for the Ages." I like the composition.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/31/2006 07:03:52 PM
Courtesy critique:

Composition/perspective: The overall balance and composition is good in the image. The subject is well placed for the crop - eliminates thirds as a negative. The apparent weight of the statue (appears to be solid metal which indicates weight) with the stone wall behind it creates a presence that should install a sense of strength and permanence. The problem with that perspective, IMO, is the focus and light (see below). The DoF presented in the shot is a little confusing - perhaps the processing? The statue is crisp and sharp, the pillars appear soft with the detail sort of blurred, but the stone wall behind, although blurred as if DoF is the controlling factor, but the edges are a bit too sharp to support that m- as in the pillar seems to be more out of focus than the wall does.

Color: The preservation of such harsh...or cold colors is well done. The tonal range is well preserved. Some of the white appears a bit bright (see below), but the preservation of the rich metallic feel of the statue and the hard delineation of the stone wall is well done. The splash of blue I find refreshing in the shot - the calm or eye of the storm so to speak.

Light: I find this aspect to be not as strong as the others. The pillar appears a bit bright, as does the header beam above the words. The top of the statue's head is lost in the beam as well as the shoulder (his right, picture left). This spot seems to draw attention due to this. The highlights on the arms are not as distracting as there is more definition in shape whereas the head appears to be flat because of it..

Challenge requirements: this is where I feel it fell short. The words above the statue are from French Legion and actually mean "Honor and Fatherland.' This is a total disconnect from the mood and lyric of the song. The song is indicative of someone going it alone without the help/companionship of another after the break-up of a relationship and the photo indicates something of honor or patriotism in times of battle. It may have come across stronger without the words in the shot. Then it would be a solitary person with no outside reference to influence the voters. The one element of the lyric that is represented well here is individual strength. But I don't think most voters will go that far...they will take it on first impression from a very short look.

Overall/my opinion: I will admit I am not that familiar with the Beatles and their music. I did a lot of research for this challenge. This was one song I had to look up. I really like the intent of the shot and the strength of the presence of the statue in the composition. But feel that was offset by the text. It just changes the whole mood of the shot from a lyric to more of a remembrance or tribute/memorial. Without that I think it would be much stronger for the purpose.

Hope this helps, please feel free to PM to discuss any element above.

C/A
  Photographer found comment helpful.
05/31/2006 04:08:15 PM
7- good composition
  Photographer found comment helpful.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 03:27:13 PM EDT.