Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
07/02/2006 08:45:15 PM |
I much prefer when there is at least SOME part of the photo in sharp focus. This way, all I'm seeing is accidental camera movement. |
|
|
07/02/2006 05:43:40 PM |
Sorry, but this just looks like a bad snapshot. To be effective, this sort of shot needs to have something in focus. The red hat guy's face would be a good focus point. |
|
|
07/01/2006 07:55:16 AM |
Definite motion blur there. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/29/2006 02:57:45 PM |
now thats motion-blur. it would of been nice if the camera followed someone to have a subject. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/28/2006 10:51:10 PM |
I've given the same basic comment on quite a few shots -- my preference (as I discovered while looking at a number of these blur shots) is for a sharp subject. When there is no sharp subject, my eye wanders around trying to find something to focus on. That really happens on this shot. Perhaps just a difference in artistic preference. |
|
|
06/28/2006 03:09:13 PM |
It is good, but it might be better if there was a focal point to the picture. |
|
|
06/27/2006 10:33:46 PM |
I wish there was an infocus subject to draw my eye too. |
|
|
06/27/2006 04:15:51 PM |
I don't think the motion does anything for this shot. Too much of the detail is lost in the blur. |
|
|
06/27/2006 08:56:16 AM |
Great idea. I think the exposure is a bit too long. But the effect is interesting and happy. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/26/2006 10:03:45 AM |
|
|
06/26/2006 04:44:25 AM |
IMO the Motion Blur should be seperated from something that is not moving. i.e. the background. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 02:23:02 AM EDT.