DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Solstice Dancer
Solstice Dancer
Germaine


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Motion Blur II (Advanced Editing IV*)
Camera: Canon EOS-20D
Lens: Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Location: Alameda Park
Date: Jun 24, 2006
Aperture: f29
ISO: 100
Shutter: 1/3"
Galleries: Performance, Action
Date Uploaded: Jun 25, 2006

N/A

Statistics
Place: 174 out of 177
Avg (all users): 4.1728
Avg (commenters): 4.1111
Avg (participants): 3.9333
Avg (non-participants): 4.3276
Views since voting: 840
Views during voting: 295
Votes: 191
Comments: 11
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
 Comments Made During the Challenge
07/02/2006 08:45:15 PM
I much prefer when there is at least SOME part of the photo in sharp focus. This way, all I'm seeing is accidental camera movement.
07/02/2006 05:43:40 PM
Sorry, but this just looks like a bad snapshot. To be effective, this sort of shot needs to have something in focus. The red hat guy's face would be a good focus point.
07/01/2006 07:55:16 AM
Definite motion blur there.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
06/29/2006 02:57:45 PM
now thats motion-blur. it would of been nice if the camera followed someone to have a subject.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
06/28/2006 10:51:10 PM
I've given the same basic comment on quite a few shots -- my preference (as I discovered while looking at a number of these blur shots) is for a sharp subject. When there is no sharp subject, my eye wanders around trying to find something to focus on. That really happens on this shot. Perhaps just a difference in artistic preference.
06/28/2006 03:09:13 PM
It is good, but it might be better if there was a focal point to the picture.
06/27/2006 10:33:46 PM
I wish there was an infocus subject to draw my eye too.
06/27/2006 04:15:51 PM
I don't think the motion does anything for this shot. Too much of the detail is lost in the blur.
06/27/2006 08:56:16 AM
Great idea. I think the exposure is a bit too long. But the effect is interesting and happy.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
06/26/2006 10:03:45 AM
to blurry
06/26/2006 04:44:25 AM
IMO the Motion Blur should be seperated from something that is not moving. i.e. the background.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 02:23:02 AM EDT.