Author | Thread |
|
10/09/2006 10:32:34 AM |
Haha, definately a DNMC. I guess I learned my lesson. ;) I still like the photo.
FYI, there sure is some sticklers for topics that couldn't be more objective..."gather"?? But thats the results of topic-based challenges! =) Thx for looking. |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
10/06/2006 10:34:30 PM |
Pretty photo, but I wonder if it belongs in this challenge. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/06/2006 12:23:07 PM |
Stars and trees pretty much do go together = they're not exactly unrelated. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/05/2006 10:23:21 PM |
These are related to me..sorry |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/03/2006 06:08:26 PM |
Nice, I think that if the trees were total shadows it would be better. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/03/2006 03:11:50 AM |
beautiful pic - not sure if it meets the challenge criteria - none the less 7 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/02/2006 02:54:22 PM |
there are to many elements in this photo for me, it doesnt meet the challenge as there should only be two objects. sorry. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/02/2006 02:32:42 PM |
(1) i see more than two objects
(2) i don't think the objects in this photo were 'gathered'
(3) substantial relations exist between stars, trees, and clouds |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/02/2006 10:14:45 AM |
Absolutely gorgeous shot, but I don't feel it applies to unrelatedness. Trees need the sky and light. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/15/2025 05:36:37 AM EDT.