Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
11/28/2006 07:55:46 PM |
|
|
11/28/2006 04:05:22 PM |
missing the year from the title... |
|
|
11/27/2006 01:46:40 PM |
The photo looks washed out. Seems as contrast should be adjusted. No points deduced for missing year 1954... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/27/2006 11:31:06 AM |
nice font. i like the combination of everything in the photo and how the pledge allegiance paper is a slightly different shade than the book |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/27/2006 02:36:14 AM |
i understand the meaning behind the shoot...to me it is lacking in contrast |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/26/2006 07:35:29 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/26/2006 01:08:19 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/26/2006 06:14:47 AM |
how does this signify the year of your birth? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/25/2006 01:19:16 PM |
Lovely..but you may find that you get criticised for not having included your year in the title...? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/25/2006 01:14:00 AM |
Wow! You were born in 1892??? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/24/2006 01:06:19 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/24/2006 11:03:43 AM |
Man this new screen urging you to leave comments for low votes is a pain. Basically, to me, this shot does not say any particular year to me. The lighting seems a little 'off' and the overall image has a bit of a hazy look to it. This is just my opinion. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/24/2006 03:58:10 AM |
What year are you claiming to be born in, 1892 when the original was written or 1954, when the words 'under God' were added?
reference: The Pledge of Allegiance - A Short History |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/23/2006 02:37:34 PM |
what does this have to do with the year you were born, and what year was that, since it was not in the title.. did they start saying this in school that year? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/23/2006 12:44:33 PM |
Sorry, but just from looking at this and the title I can't tell what year it refers to, so sorry DNMC. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/23/2006 10:14:14 AM |
I see no reference to the year |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/23/2006 08:01:32 AM |
You were born a fairly long time ago I take it? Sorry, just don't see any connection to the challenge here at all. Where is the year in your title? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 11:56:07 PM |
DNMC - no date in title. Focus could be sharper. nice composition. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 09:50:39 PM |
Great concept. What year did we add that 'under God' bit again? 1954, I think? If you were born in 1892, I want to know the secret! :) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 07:49:32 PM |
Your black/white point seem off just a little.(blacks dont appear true black) or it might be just a lack of contrast. I appreciate your layout though. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 04:13:28 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 02:39:38 PM |
Not being an American I don't really get what year this is meant to represent. Anyway. Good photo, focus & depth of field seem to work. Colours are bold. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 01:10:56 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 12:13:07 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 11:38:45 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 10:51:09 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 10:43:29 AM |
Are you going for the year "under God" was added? Hard to tell. Maybe if the pledge card was sticking out from under a closed bible with "BIBLE" embossed on the front. Of course, disregard that comment if I totally missed the point here ;-) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 09:56:21 AM |
What year? I like the composition. Looks like the pledge could have been a little sharper. The book marker ribbon is distracting to me also.... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 08:33:41 AM |
the year should be "mentioned in the title".. nice idea, good composition, fair quality.. 6 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 06:32:43 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 06:28:28 AM |
this can represent about any year can't it? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 12:50:31 AM |
"You should include the year in your title." I'll have to guess at the year. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 12:49:51 AM |
Year of birth would have made this better to understand. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
11/22/2006 12:20:27 AM |
Take us back to yesteryear by photographing something that defined the year you were born. Start googling, looking through old news papers and magazines, and show us your photographic interpretation of the year of your birth. Your title should should include the year.
Doh! But a nice picture ... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/11/2025 01:57:01 PM EDT.