DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Seeking Light
Seeking Light
bgslaw


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Flora II (Basic Editing)
Camera: Canon EOS-400D Rebel XTi
Lens: Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Date: Oct 8, 2007
Aperture: F/20
ISO: 100
Shutter: 30 sec.
Galleries: Still Life, Floral
Date Uploaded: Oct 8, 2007

Cropped, Increased Saturation, Unsharp Mask, Resized

Statistics
Place: 225 out of 325
Avg (all users): 5.0427
Avg (commenters): 6.2500
Avg (participants): 4.8718
Avg (non-participants): 5.1977
Views since voting: 655
Views during voting: 198
Votes: 164
Comments: 7
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
10/29/2007 06:29:50 AM
Originally posted by bgslaw:

I understand several comments state "flat lighting" and lighting could be better. I would like to know how I could improve the lighting.

I shot by a window w/ indirect lighting without a flash.
Repeat my little 'caveat' in my previous comment.

I usually prefer natural light with flowers (just personal preference). You say you've used natural light, indirect, but it is barely discernible in this image. I wonder if it was more prominent before your processing.

Anyway, first thing I notice in this image is that the focus is off (could be blur too). It is a delicate yellow (I'm trying to work out if it is a day lily, amaryllis or other) - nice flower. You mention in your comments two things that intrigued me - you upped the saturation (which I can't 'see') and you applied an unsharp mask. I'm not sure if you were aiming to achieve a certain effect in this image, but it is not 'strong' either way. The background is not enhancing the colors or making the flower 'pop'. A little more distance between the subject and the background, and ensuring there is no 'crease' line visible, would have helped give the image more depth. Lastly, is the 'cut' flower at the bottom. Obviously a difficult crop, so perhaps paying more attention to your composition and 'framing' in camera, would make it easier for you once you get the image to edit.

I didn't vote in this Challenge, but if I did I likely wouldn't have scored this above 3 - because of my reasons stated above, but also because I had/have a different idea of 'flora' - and Challenge themes are important to me when I vote.

Don't pack up the camera if you 'want' to take images - perhaps see how the camera can help you 'create' an image. If these are your favorite subjects, experiment. Experiment with composition, lighting, etc. Get one of your images printed ('largeish') and put it somewhere and study it. See what could be improved. Imagine and then try. Practice makes perfect ... or so they say. Feel free to rip apart/comment on any of mine if you wish to train your eye. Commenting is educational in itself, in a variety of ways.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
10/24/2007 12:44:10 AM
I understand several comments state "flat lighting" and lighting could be better. I would like to know how I could improve the lighting.

I shot by a window w/ indirect lighting without a flash.
 Comments Made During the Challenge
10/15/2007 08:43:29 PM
lighting could be better.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
10/14/2007 12:43:44 PM
Pretty portrait.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
10/12/2007 05:54:10 PM
needs better light and focus center.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
10/12/2007 02:33:59 PM
nice focus nice background 7
  Photographer found comment helpful.
10/10/2007 04:52:04 AM
flat lighting, good subject
  Photographer found comment helpful.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/14/2025 09:02:31 PM EDT.