Author | Thread |
|
02/20/2008 02:50:26 PM |
sorry everyone. I thought panning could also be the movement of the object while everything else is still... Now I really regret it since a shot like this would have done really well in leading lines...
Woops is all I can say, sorry for the confusion, and thanks to all who liked the image anyway. :) |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
02/19/2008 11:28:42 PM |
I love the shot. It's a nice long exposure, but I don't see the pan. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/19/2008 10:02:03 AM |
not really panning. With panning the background is blurred while a moving subject is sharp. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/19/2008 09:44:14 AM |
That's kind of the opposite of panning. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/19/2008 09:33:43 AM |
The exposure effects in this picture are truly a sight to behold. A little more color would have been nice, but I like it. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/19/2008 12:28:31 AM |
This is a cool motion shot. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/17/2008 12:05:35 AM |
isn't the background supposed to be blurred and the object in focus? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/16/2008 06:49:32 AM |
Some people will say that this is not panning. You just need to tell them that your subject (the bridge) is in motion and your camera tracked along with the bridge while a background car blurred by (it's foreground, but hey, it's all a matter of perspective).
Seriously, I love the long exposure shots like this. It doesn't meet this challenge, but you might find an angle on this shot that would meet the leading lines challenge very well. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/15/2008 09:49:32 PM |
This is very interesting and I appreciate the abstract quality. My only complaint is all the negative space. The colors and lighting work well together. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/15/2008 09:29:42 PM |
panning not long exposure........ |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/15/2008 05:41:33 PM |
not really a panning shot |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/14/2008 04:22:55 PM |
Something very interesting about the railing lights..can't quite put my finger on it..;) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/14/2008 12:27:51 PM |
This is not panning at all.. it's just a long exposure. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/14/2008 12:43:02 AM |
Great photo, but how is this "panning"? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 11:31:36 PM |
I don't think this is panning |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 08:11:21 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 07:46:24 PM |
Wow..evrything seems to be glowing |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 06:49:40 PM |
nice pic but not really panning |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 02:41:45 PM |
this is not motion panning |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 09:53:11 AM |
I see long exposure, but I don't see panning. Sorry. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 08:41:57 AM |
not panning, good picture though |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
02/13/2008 12:47:23 AM |
I would consider this more a long exposure than a panning shot. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/03/2025 07:55:57 PM EDT.