Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
03/26/2004 12:19:22 AM |
Hmm... the crocus is the focus- the dog isn't even paying attention. Sort of like shooting the back of my kid's head for Parents magazine. Pet photos CAN do well here, but you'd need an amazing pose, or dramatic lighting or at least a closeup of the dog's face to succeed. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/25/2004 08:23:56 PM |
Blurry and just not very interesting. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/25/2004 07:23:41 AM |
Let's see his/her face next time! I would expect to more fully see the subject on the cover of a magazine. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/24/2004 03:30:28 PM |
I'm sorry but this just looks like a snap to me with little thought about the placement of the magazine title and features text . I had a quick look on the net and it seems that the dogs face on the cover of the magazine is pretty much mandatory. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/24/2004 03:53:33 AM |
This is a cute shot. To me it would be more effective if the dog were in better focus. The grass seems to be in better focus than the dog. It looks like the dog is smelling the flower. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/23/2004 06:13:51 PM |
I would think that for Dog World, a cover photo would either show the dog's face, or have a dog performing some dramatic "action". This photo does neither. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/23/2004 02:07:48 PM |
sorry, very bad picture, focus is behind the dog not on the dog, head is down, can't recognise the type of dog, composition is bang in the middle, not making it more interesting. Exposure is fine. Can't see this on any cover. |
|
|
03/23/2004 11:02:54 AM |
Seems a little blury,
just what is he doing?
hmmm |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/23/2004 05:15:30 AM |
(I'm writing this to everyone who submitted a landscape shot) The challenge was to produce a shot worthy of a magazine cover but to me a shot like this is not suitable to be put on a "portrait" format magazine.
---ADDITIONAL---
Due to forum discussions and accusations that marking landscapes down is nitpicking, I'm going through them and remarking. I still think some of the landscapes would not make good covers because of their orientation but I am no longer marking down because of that.
I still think landscape is inapropriate for the majority of magazines but I'll give the benefit of the doubt to the photographers. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/22/2004 07:27:50 AM |
Nice idea, but how many magazine covers use the landscape format? |
|
|
03/22/2004 07:09:46 AM |
would have liked to see the dogs face and in focus |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/22/2004 12:45:41 AM |
Need the face.....top of the head is not of interest. :( Sorry but you were a hair too late on the shutter. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 08:15:37 AM EDT.