Author | Thread |
|
12/16/2011 01:35:33 AM |
I am blown away at how far you have come as a photographer in such a short period. For real. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/20/2008 08:03:49 AM |
Thanks for all the comments and suggestions. I have to agree about the setup and background lighting. I was trying to create a sense of darkness because of pollution, but I didn't pull it off as I wanted. (by the way the model is one of my sons, he is just extremely good looking kid. He gets his looks from his mother) |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
03/17/2008 01:21:48 PM |
She looks a little crosseyed from wearing that thing. (That is a girl in there, right?) If not for the title, I would have missed the fact that it is a playground, as the background is so dark. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/17/2008 10:23:55 AM |
the sharpness of your photo makes it stand out |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/17/2008 06:48:28 AM |
may be close up in portrait composition were more appealing..... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/16/2008 02:34:35 PM |
This picture would have been neat if the background wasn't so dark. Also, having the subject more involved would have made a very nice shot. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/15/2008 05:45:33 PM |
the scary expressions in kid's eyes are just brilliant. this kid has acting potential :)
i did not like the choice of a night-shoot where it is not possible to see the details in the background. this could have been a 10 photo for me if it was shot in day light with high-key post-processing. i wouldn't change a thing in composition and kid's expressions though. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/15/2008 12:15:54 PM |
I feel you could have gone with a more moody lighting, and considered what would be in the background |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/14/2008 09:24:17 AM |
too obvious. not interesting and poorly exposed. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/14/2008 02:15:58 AM |
I wish the background was a bit brighter. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/13/2008 10:55:03 PM |
I thought this might have been caused by a dirty diaper from whatever creature might have used that swing behind his head. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/13/2008 02:20:45 PM |
It would have been nice to actually see the playground... the idea was good but the lighting is also too harsh on your subject. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/13/2008 01:29:39 PM |
Really like the idea.. Perhaps the difference of lighting between the foreground and background is a little too much.. The composition is really good but the flash makes the picture seem snapshotish. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/13/2008 11:38:01 AM |
Should have brought more light in on the playground. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/12/2008 09:37:09 PM |
Interesting idea. However, the background is underexposed, perhaps a different way of lighting the frame would have been better. Keep trying! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/12/2008 06:45:15 PM |
Nice idea, Wow that looks like a heavy duty breathing apparatus. I hope it isn't that bad in 2038?? Love the DOF in this image the darkness in the background really works well. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
03/12/2008 04:59:56 PM |
too much light on the person in the pro-mask and not enough light on the "playground" for impact, a different perspective for sure for a entry |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/14/2025 06:16:46 AM EDT.