Author | Thread |
|
06/26/2009 07:46:44 PM |
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver: Originally posted by scope: It's a nice photo, but why is it upside-down? |
Are you serious? Did you read the challenge name before you started voting? |
I understand that you flipped it because you had to. My point was that it doesn't make any sense for this image. |
|
|
10/25/2008 12:56:46 PM |
Originally posted by cujee: A 4.3??? what the mother of crap is that all about? |
HAHAHAHA don't know. |
|
|
10/25/2008 11:00:29 AM |
A 4.3??? what the mother of crap is that all about?
Message edited by author 2008-10-25 11:00:52. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/23/2008 06:13:30 PM |
Originally posted by BeeCee: It's not a bad photo at all, in general terms, however for THIS challenge I'm not too surprised by the score.
I think the main problem is that nothing is gained by flipping it. It doesn't give the impression, for example, of defying gravity, it doesn't really add any unique perspective. It's just... flipped... simply for the purpose of flipping. :) |
But that wasn't the description of the challenge and this only proves that DPC'ers expect certain images with each challenge. |
|
|
10/23/2008 04:25:29 PM |
It's not a bad photo at all, in general terms, however for THIS challenge I'm not too surprised by the score.
I think the main problem is that nothing is gained by flipping it. It doesn't give the impression, for example, of defying gravity, it doesn't really add any unique perspective. It's just... flipped... simply for the purpose of flipping. :) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/23/2008 02:27:37 PM |
Originally posted by Mark-A: I would like to add to my comment below actually (as I posted in the challenge postmortem thread) and please bear in mind I was only commenting so came at it from a different angle than most others (voters and those leaving comments).
I think as you say there were a reasonably large amount of entries that were just a flip rotation without the flip / rotation adding anything to the image, I think the important thing here was had you added an element of upside down in this image (a glass full of fluid that was pointing to the top of the image as one other person did) it would have better met the challenge.
Sorry if my comment sounded harsh it wasn't meant as a rant and I do think this is technically a very good SP. |
I don't think it was harsh at all, I'm not mad about this image. Like I stated it was only an entry for the extra point that's it. I knew it wasn't a good idea but like I said I had nothing. Actually the challenges over the last 3 weeks have been so boring it's like I don't even want to enter them.
Money for example, didn't we just have a Affluence challenge, isn't that the same thing as money?
Then we just had a Suburbia challenge and now we have Street Photography III? WTF, it's the same thing with a different name.
Just getting to me a little bit I guess. |
|
|
10/23/2008 02:22:05 PM |
I would like to add to my comment below actually (as I posted in the challenge postmortem thread) and please bear in mind I was only commenting so came at it from a different angle than most others (voters and those leaving comments).
I think as you say there were a reasonably large amount of entries that were just a flip rotation without the flip / rotation adding anything to the image, I think the important thing here was had you added an element of upside down in this image (a glass full of fluid that was pointing to the top of the image as one other person did) it would have better met the challenge.
Sorry if my comment sounded harsh it wasn't meant as a rant and I do think this is technically a very good SP. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/23/2008 02:14:22 PM |
Originally posted by scope: It's a nice photo, but why is it upside-down? |
Are you serious? Did you read the challenge name before you started voting? |
|
|
10/23/2008 02:13:44 PM |
Originally posted by JesiLynR: I think this one suffered from the flipping, voters mostly saw it as a shoehorn entry...it's great technically tho, the focus is very sharp and the lighting is excellent. |
I guess the downside to that was this:
[Challenge Description]
Description
N/A
No where did anything say you couldn't just flip a picture upside down. I'm sure out of 169 entries I could find about 60%+ that were just flipped upside down.. After all that was the the challenge ya know. |
|
|
10/23/2008 02:10:39 PM |
I think this one suffered from the flipping, voters mostly saw it as a shoehorn entry...it's great technically tho, the focus is very sharp and the lighting is excellent. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/23/2008 01:51:56 PM |
I think the DPCO is bring out the worst in some voters. I have seen so many good photos being scored at least a full point lower than they should.
As another user noted, '5 is the new 6'. :( |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
10/21/2008 09:03:50 AM |
its very literal! it's a good portrait though if in the correct position. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/19/2008 08:34:41 AM |
Rotated :(
Bored with seeing so many normal shots rotated why do people think this fits the challenge at all?
Would have had a 3 from me for the reasons above sorry.
Comment Only |
|
|
10/18/2008 05:16:03 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/18/2008 12:05:52 PM |
If I could see this was taken in a mirror then I would mark higher, unfortunatly it looks like a picture flipped over |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
10/15/2008 12:42:27 AM |
It's a nice photo, but why is it upside-down? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/03/2025 07:35:31 PM EDT.